Reply to Concerned about BOE Candidate Sunil Dasgupta’s binding boundary review commission

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Concerned about BOE Candidate Sunil Dasgupta’s binding boundary review commission"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I wanted to raise awareness of the issue.  It’s surprising to me that the Apple Ballot which I have voted for without more information in the past would be comfortable with a policy that does not give families and teachers with families as much of a voice and choice.  Do Apple Ballot voters know about this independent commission?  Maybe they do.

Thank you for the additional information about Twinbrook. I’m sorry. I did not realize that Twinbrook didn’t get the addition.  I wish you the best of luck in being able to get it.  I will do more research and try to learn more and advocate for all families from what I learned from you.  
[/quote]

An addition to Twinbrook was NEVER advocated for or bargained as part of the boundary study. I'm not sure where you got that misinformation from. It wasn't a bargaining chip and isn't something related to the boundary study at all. It's completely irrelevant to your post other than to call into question your understanding of the whole boundary study process as it is now or could be in the future. And anyone who may have given you this misinformation is equally misinformed and should maybe step back before voting based on misinformation.[/quote]

Most of the advocating was from parents at other schools advocating for their kids not to get moved to Twinbrook...however I do think it would have not accomplished much for the kids to move from a neighborhood school with Title 1 class sizes to a distant school with large classes.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics