Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Sibling offered vs Sibling enrolled"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are you all sure that s/he moves to the bottom of sibling enrolled, and not in that category based on lottery number?[/quote] I think the PPs are wrong and you end up placed based on your initial lottery number w/in your new pref category (although w/ #1 on the WL being the best you can do). When we move IB to a new school post lottery for PK4, we jumped from 70+ to 1 on the WL and jumped other IB families. We got in and some IB families didn’t, so we definitely did not go to the bottom of the new preference category. [/quote] This is correct. Your waitlisted kid's master number will determine where in the "sibling enrolled" waitlist he is- so yes, the faster you get your older kid enrolled the better as otherwise someone already in the"sibling enrolled" could get an offer if a spot opens up before you enroll your older kids and you otherwise would have jumped ahead. [/quote] This is really depressing to me, because it means my waitlisted sibling enrolled who probably got a bad draw could get bumped back by a newly enrolled sibling, even though we have already been at the school for years. I'd hope that longevity at the school would matter. [/quote] Longevity at school is not a lottery preference category. I get your disappointment but not sure it should matter- people move to the city all the time and have to get their kids in; or maybe someone last year had an awful number and finally got lucky with the lottery. Last year my DD got down to #1 on the waitlist for our in bounds for PK3 and then this year got an awful number and is towards the end of the WL for in bounds for PK4- it would have been nice to have gotten consideration for ranking my in bounds #1 and almost getting in but I didn't and this is similar as being at a school longer term and not getting pereference. Someone who wants it more or who has wanted it longer doesn't have the ability to jump the list[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics