Reply to Cindy Crawford’s son is “ misunderstood”

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Cindy Crawford’s son is “ misunderstood”"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Being privileged doesn’t mean anything if there is something fundamentally wrong in the household. [b]When kids act out - regardless of the parents good lucks and wealth - you have to think that there’s something disturbing about their childhood.[/b] Could be anything from grandpa is an alcoholic to only the nanny’s took care of me to sexual abuse. We will never know. We will only see the results and that goes for any family. [/quote]

[quote=Anonymous]
https://www.eonline.com/news/1120858/cindy-crawford-s-son-presley-gerber-unveils-dramatic-face-tattoo

He’s all ready for prison now. What a waste of genetics. [b]What is wrong with Cindy and Rande?[/b] Their kids - now adults - grew up privileged and are now a hot mess. One tries to look and sound like a street gangster, the other is vacant and anorexic. I just don’t get it.[/quote]

I disagree with the bolded statements. Sometimes it has nothing to do with the parents or the upbringing. [/quote]

So … you think he was BORN this way?  Highly doubtful.  I have worked for years with troubled and high risk kids.  In the argument of nature versus nurture, I have yet to see a troubled or high risk child where the problem stemmed from nature.  Certainly some of this young man's nature is exerting its influence but his parents had a responsibility to see and respond to this child's specific needs, and they failed in a very obvious way as he is demonstrating.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics