Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Should local jurisidictions buy homes that get flooded? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If the flooding experienced by these properties was exacerbated by new development that was approved after they were constructed, then I can't see how the locality can not be compelled to purchase them. [/quote] Why should it be on the locality and not the developer?[/quote] The locality approved the developer's project without taking into account stormwater management. [/quote] How is that possible though? They have laws/regulations about this. Did the project not comply?[/quote] You hire a firm to do an environmental study. Since the firm is for profit they are going to find whatever you ask them to find. Unfortunately, purely objective analysis is difficult with something this complicated as well. However there's also idiots as well. There is a developer that wants to build in a flood plain down here in Fairfax county. It's currently zoned industrial, he wants to rezone as residential and dump six or so feet of soil to get up out the flood plain and build townhouses. Sure, this sounds like a good idea. Is this sustainable? Constant erosion seems like a problem. And 6' is good enough for now. What about 20 years from now?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics