Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "political appointee woes"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]This is an interesting debate. I imagine these are the things that (under this administration, maybe not under a different one) inspire the woke and stir the fury of those who oppose the Deep State. More mildly, these are thing things some people approve as the necessary judgment and competent an executive department NEEDS (!!) to execute our laws (passed by Congress, usually signed by the President, encoded into regulations, and so on). Is a civil servant NOT supposed to execute policy? What a question. Is a civil servant just supposed to "follow orders"? Also, what a question. Leads me to ponder--what, if any, federal agency is the least affected by politics? I thought maybe the USGS but nope, climate change. Maybe fracking too come to think. Nuclear waste disposal. But now I am curious. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
