Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "How bad is 0% morphology?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]we have 0-1% morphology (tested about 5 different times over 4 years) and we only conceived via IVF. I was 31-34 when TTC and had all normal testing. We had success both times with IVF and now have 4 year old twins and a one year old. I kept waiting for a miracle natural pregnancy (because you do hear of it happening with very poor morphology) but it never happened to us. We had a total of 5 years of no birth control and spent much of that time actively timing sex to get pregnant. I think it may come down to where the defects are on the sperm. Some men may have misshapen sperm but they are still able to fertilize an egg. Others (like my husband) may have defects that prevent natural fertilization. In our case, once fertilization was done via ICSI, the embryos were beautiful and they implanted without a problem. Also, it truly only takes one. That one "lucky" sperm in a man with very poor morphology could randomly make it to the egg the first month of TTC or it may never make it despite years and years of trying. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics