Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "Short luteal phase and (mostly) unmedicated FET..."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m supposed to be going forward with an unmedicated FET next month. My period seems to be starting (I started spotting brown today so day 1 likely tomorrow) which will have made my past cycle’s luteal phase 9-10 days. My clinic will have me begin progesterone after the transfer but the cycle will otherwise be unmedicated. Cause for concern or not really? I emailed my nurse but won’t hear back until Monday. TIA![/quote] So sounds like that you are doing a natural cycle IVF, thus what they are prescribing is a standard protocol. in case of fresh ET, they'd prescribe progesteron suppositories to supplement naturally produced progesteron by the corpus luteum. In frozen ET they prescribe more potent progesteron in oil shots. IVF clinics don't care about short luteal phases (and my RE does not believe in luteal phase defect) since they are attempting to circumvent this with progesteron supplementation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
