Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Why do one teacher have to teach four courses in elementary school?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]ELA, Math, science and Social study, that's a lot, isn't it?[/quote] It's pretty standard. Or sometimes they have one teacher do math and science and another do ELA and social studies.[/quote] Yes, departmentalizing makes planning and prepping easier. With the new ELA curriculum it will be much harder for grade levels to departmentalize because each ELA block needs to be 2 hours uninterrupted, and while it’s easy to make that happen once per day, it’s not easy to make that time block happen twice per day in any given grade level. There are pros and cons to departmentalizing, but as a teacher I’ve seen more pros than cons. [/quote] Of course you do. Departmentalizing IS the most teacher friendly. But it isn’t the most student-friendly, at least for the kid that struggles the most with building connections and trust. Who’s tracking any issues that the kid is having across the day? Who is building that positive relationship with the family? And you really think it’s developmentally appropriate for 7 year olds to be switching classes all day for academic subjects? From a curriculum standpoint, it’s difficult to do any type of cross curricular project based learning. I’ve been a public school educator for almost 30 years. I’ve mostly taught the upper elementary grades. I’ve done both departmentalized and self-contained classrooms. While departmentalized was easier on me, there was no real classroom community. I hated how some kids fell through the cracks. [/quote] Looks like overgeneralizing is your thing. Oooh, let me try. Maybe you didn’t work hard enough to create a real classroom community and you knowingly allowed some kids to fall through the cracks. Have you considered that not every school or teacher works the same way you do?[/quote] Classroom community? lol It's school community. I'm a secondary educator who's been involved in cross-curricular planning in many ways - either through a "mandated" program or by choice. I'd rather have my own children exposed to materials taught by an expert. While ES teachers are "generalists," many either lean toward mathematics/sciences or the humanities. Isn't it easier on the teacher to become an expert in an area (areas) within a school setting structured for cross-curricular planning? And guess what, educator for almost 30 years (I'm at 25.), school community is classroom community on steroids. But you're saying that you'd prefer to remain cloistered. Creating a schedule where EXPERTS can do cross-curricular planning is BEST for students and teachers. You're not here to be a child's only savior. That takes a village. 30 years . . . How sad you can't see that![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics