Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Private Immersion (Rochambeau) v. Lafayette, Deal, Wilson: we have never disagreed like this"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Neither of you is wrong, but I think that there are other ways you can foster a connection to France besides spending $25,000 a year (with an increase every year). With an only child, the neighborhood/community component would weigh even more with me, not to mention the convenience and time it would save. Have you looked into language classes and other activities at L'Alliance Francaise? They have summer camps, for example, and I think spring break stuff, too. Also, your son is not going to have more of a connection to France than you do. If your French is only spotty, etc., then it's not "his culture." It's his heritage and family history, but it's not the same. Is your husband fluent in French? He might also be concerned about his ability to participate in his kid's education if it's conducted in a language he's not totally fluent in. And it sounds like you aren't fluent, either, so you're signing up for bilingual education that you can't support at home (my polyglot husband opposed immersion for the same reason). I also think you should consider counseling. Both of you want what you think is best for your son, and you're digging in, and that's not going to end well. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics