Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "short luteal phase (11 days) - is this really a problem?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]In a vacuum, it may not be and it depends on how short it actually is. But you don't really know what else may be a contributing factor unless you go through the whole barrage of testing. FWIW, I have a 9 day luteal phase and it wasn't an issue for me. I have 2 kids - the first was a total surprise, the second took us 8 months to conceive. I was 37 at that point and after 4 months of trying, I saw an RE and did all the testing. All of my stats were normal for my age. The RE didn't have any concern about my luteal phase and didn't suggest that I take supplements to lengthen it. The one bright side of having a shorter luteal phase is that I didn't have to wait that long between ovulation and my period. My "2-week wait" was more like a week and a half at most. That said, everyone's experience is different and a RE is the best person to provide advice on how to get pregnant (not the OB).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
