Reply to RE That Isn't Just Focused on Fertility Treatment?

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "RE That Isn't Just Focused on Fertility Treatment?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]We got pregnant quickly and had our first son with no issues. I had a myomectomy the year after to remove fibroids, had zero complications and no disruption in the timing of my cycles except my flow become what seemed to be abnormally light.  We also had timed unprotected intercourse  at least 7-8 times and no pregnancy.  GYN ran a bunch of hormone tests that came back normal, still light flow (like barely a pad in a day for maybe 1.5 days).  She refers me to a RE who did some imaging found zero scar tissue, no recurrence of the fibroids or anything else structurally.  Said HSG was "inconclusive", and offered nothing else. The RE became very disinterested in my case when he mentioned "potentially" needing IVF at the initial consult before the tests, and when I told him I just want to first know what, if anything, was wrong before we even consider if we want treatment.

Here I am, 4 months later, with no answers. The periods are still extremely light, and I feel stuck. My GYN says she can only do so much testing since it has to be under a RE, but the RE she referred me to was all about JVF $$$$, without even telling me if I have a problem. He did say maybe come back and redo the HSG.

Anyone used a RE for medical purposes that wasn't focused on just the treatment? I understand treatment may be needed, but I want a RE that is going to focus on a real diagnosis before pushing such a costly solution. TIA. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics