Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "PICSI vs ICSI?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]In all the consent forms that I signed, the risk of ICSI is that the egg may be damaged by icsi or may not fertilize. However, in general, icsi has a much higher fertilization rate than conventional ivf. It also costs more. I also found this online from the UK government. https://www.healthcentre.org.uk/fertility-treatment/icsi.html What are the disadvantages of ICSI? ICSI’s method of directly introducing sperm into an egg defeats the natural process of only a select few sperm making it to and fertilising an egg. This can be a disadvantage because this selection process is nature’s way of making sure that the best sperm with the best genetic material are the ones with the best chance at fertilising an egg. Removing that selection process can lead to an increase risk of developmental and health issues for ICSI children, as well as a higher risk of miscarriage because of the poorer genetic material involved. That being said at present there is no strong research proving that any of the babies conceived by ICSI have developed impairments in their cognitive and motor skills, but there is an indication of a greater risk of physical abnormalities. An international investigation into ICSI babies found that 4.2% had a major disability, most of these around male genitals. That 4.2% is thrice the number of children with similar malformations who were conceived naturally. This study also showed that a higher percentage of ICSI and IVF children suffered from a significant illness during their childhood. As ICSI has only been in use for less than two decades, some concerns are hard to dismiss at present. One of these is the worry that children conceived through ICSI are infertile or sub-fertile as a consequence of the procedure, but again because the technique hasn’t been in use for that long, there is no concrete evidence to back such a claim. Research into the effects of ICSI is still on going, although it might be a while before concrete findings can establish or affirm any of the more severe concerns about the technique. If you have any worries yourself, then the best thing to do is talk to your doctor, whose experience in the field and matter will shed some light on the matter and help you decide whether or not you would like to pursue ICSI as a fertility treatment.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics