Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Is there any enrichment/accelleration in the proposed curriculum?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]One of the problems in MCPS is that they used inflated labeling in curriculum 2.0. Algebra I and II in Eric Lang's version of 2.0 isn't really full or complete Algebra. Its very watered down and lacking so sadly parents who think that their kids have a solid foundation will be screwed if they move to another school system or private. Big gaps - as confirmed by the Hopkins report. Other proven curriculums that were not created by a former gym teacher have more rigor, depth and coverage of the subject but to stay at the level MCPS wants the labeling will not be Algebra I by eight grade. [/quote] So I interpret your post to be saying that the current curriculum is accelerated, but weak? So, a new Algebra curriculum would be more challenging/enriched by comparison?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
