Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Beauty and Fashion
Reply to "Early 2000s looks that look dated "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pulling off the trend about "pop of color" shoes and to help us ladies stay more current: - "pop of color" shoes - colored skinny jeans - Leggings with dresses - Super clunky statement necklaces - Skinny jeans that are super tight and then bunchy around ankles - Scarves with everything, not just when out in cold weather Etc.? [/quote] I feel like these looks were around 2010, not early 2000s. I think low rise jeans, not skinny, flares with big pockets or stitching on the back. (7's, COH, Trus Religion) Or no back pockets. Halter tops and dresses Velour jogging suits Trucker hats Cargo pants in satin Pashminas [/quote] No, the low rises with the big stitching and flares were DEFINITELY in full force in the early 2000s (the Britney Spears era) and by 2010 skinnies were on the market. Same with Juicy tracksuits. I mean, by 2010 Juicy was bankrupt and being sold to Kohl's.[/quote] NM I re-read your post. I'm confused. Sorry. :)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics