Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Letting go of Fee-Based Advisor"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Do you mean your current advisor is charging a % of managed assets? What is your %? [/quote] yes, he's charging a quarterly fee based on the value of our total investments. we're at 1.25%. we end up paying a few thousand a year, if i were to add up all the quarterlies. over 15 years, that is a big pill to swallow.[/quote] We use an adviser also, and we're at 0.75 or 0.8% -- 1.25% is high. Is he independent (like not at a company that also sells their own funds)? You can always meet with him to ask him to justify his fees. To us, the fees are made up [b]just by them doing tax loss harvesting and portfolio rebalancing[/b], both of which I could do, but would honestly never get done if it was on my list. Then the added value is on the advisory side. We meet with our advisers once a quarter, and use them for advice on tax minimization, college planning, retirement, plannning, estate planning, and trust planning. If you're not using them for this (all of this is included in the existing fees), then you're not getting the value you could from your adviser. [/quote] Using a balanced fun or a Target Retirement fund achieves the rebalancing for far, far less money. Have you really run the numbers on how often they are TLH? I find it happens less frequently than many think. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics