Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lawn and Garden
Reply to "[DC] Hazardous tree not ruled as hazardous on permit removal "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] the DC tree permitting is strictly money making venture.[/quote] This is not true. It is designed to discourage developers from clearcutting every property and leaving the city without trees. If anything, the permit cost for removing healthy trees is far too low.[/quote] Agreed.[/quote] but when you have a certified arborist reporting the tree is severely compromised, it should not even be a question. the fact that DC still want money for a take down permit is crazy I have an oak tree that is 20" in diameter that has grown through a historic wrought iron fence. its dropping 2-3" caliper branches on a regular basis. Branches that are dropping on a DCbikeshare rack. DC abortionist won't let us take it down with out paying the fee. they consider it a healthy tree. I don' thave a problem with the charging a fee to cut down healthy trees. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
