Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lawn and Garden
Reply to "[DC] Hazardous tree not ruled as hazardous on permit removal "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Get a second opinion. The first arborist may have been "over-enthusiastic". We get our trees trimmed by someone we trust, called Bob Taylor (not talkative, but absolutely knows his job!). He monitors one of our trees that is diseased and that ultimately will have to go, but instead of charging us at least $4,000 to get rid of it (it's very wide and used to be very tall), he has been cutting off branches shorter and shorter each year, and it will be cheaper to fell when the time comes. ebobtaylor@yahoo.com (301) 229-8367[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
