Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Index funds vs actively managed mutual funds"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Let’s say half —50% - the active funds make selections that beat the market in a given year. That’s mathematically the most logical expectation. If you account for fees of active management, you’re down to about 40% of them beating the market net of fees. Then you have to account for taxes incurred by the managers’ active trading. Now it’s 30% beating the market net of fees and taxes. Now...which 30%? There’s no demonstrated repeatability. In other words, a fund that’s in the lucky 30% one year has not shown any increased likelihood of being in that 30% in subsequent years. Investment companies work around this by closing funds that happen to have poor track records, and this way they can show you that an impressive number to f their (remaining) funds have beaten the market. This is called survivorship bias. Picking funds is just guessing, and the odds are stacked against you. The longer you buy and hold index funds, the more the tax advantage of deferred capital gains compounds in your favor.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics