Reply to Soccer

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Soccer - PAC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]My experience is with PAC and McLean. I 100% agree that it is a much better experience at PAC than on the lower teams of McLean in absolutely every way. I can't speak highly enough about how PAC develops players. It is true that in the early years, PAC will take players that other clubs reject, but it's because the club believes in its training program! I have seen them turn a somewhat unskilled group of kids into a team that plays beautiful soccer in about a year.

I think some of the posts above undersell the level at PAC. I think it's the 2004s and 2003 that have very recently had teams that could compete with the neighboring big clubs' top teams--not their middle and lower teams. However, the size of the club, while a huge part of what's great about it, has its drawbacks. One of those teams sent its two strongest players on scholarship to the UK this year, plus a couple more to their proper age group. As a result, the team went from Division 1 to Division 3. A club this size doesn't have the reserves in place when players move around--and players do sometimes leave because the may be looking for Academy teams or ECNL.

If you are looking for a club that cares about player development and teaches good soccer, PAC is a great place.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics