Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "No one has turned in bump stocks in NJ after ban."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]i have to think that collection of bump stocks is pretty low on the priority list for New Jersey police officers, but we’ll see.[/quote] I would assume so as well, but it just illustrates that the compliance rates to control control restrictions are unbelievably low.[/quote] Well the priority was high enough for legislative action. If the police refuse to enforce the bump stock ban, opponents to future gun laws will hold this up as an example of why new laws won't work because the police refuse to enforce them. [/quote] It's the same thing in NY and Ct for magazines and "assault rifle registration." Those registration rates were around 4%. In NY 44,000 out of an estimated 1 million "assault weapons" were registered. NY had more success with handgun registration, which had about an 80% registration rate, with about 81,000 people not registering them who had a handgun license prior to 2013. https://www.npr.org/2018/01/31/581879702/in-new-york-gun-owners-balk-at-new-handgun-database https://hudsonvalleyone.com/2016/07/07/massive-noncompliance-with-safe-act/ https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/State-Police-says-assault-weapon-owners-need-to-12816410.php http://reason.com/blog/2014/02/12/connecticut-pols-shocked-that-tens-of-th[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics