Reply to Randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed studies of OT efficacy?

Forum Index » Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities

Reply to "Randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed studies of OT efficacy?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No. I am a school psychologist and when I looked into OT for my child I couldn't find any peer reviewed, quality research supporting most things OT's do. My son had fine motor issues and some "sensory issues". I wasn't surprised because he went to a play based preschool in California where he never has to pick up a pencil or crayon  if he didn't want to do so (and he never did) and didn't have to wear shoes.  So. I surprise when he turned 5 he couldn't write or even copy letters. People on this forum really seem to dislike  Kumon but for him it worked wonders because he was required to trace and then write letters every day for 10 minutes. Within a few months he had excellent printing skills and could effortlessly write letters and then words using the correct formation (top to bottom, etc).  My son had awful fine motor skills because he never used his hand for writing. His grip was strong from playing on monkey bars or making play-Doh but he hadn't used and coordinated those muscles for writing. [/quote]

If your story is accurate, then your child really didn't need therapy--he needed exposure and repetition. My kid had exposure and repetition -- in abundance -- and still could not write. Unfortunately for him, OT didn't help either--he was eventually diagnosed with very severe dysgraphia, but it was the logical place to start.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics