Reply to Tuckahoe - Boundary after Nottingham becomes ATS/IB?

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Tuckahoe - Boundary after Nottingham becomes ATS/IB?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What will drive the Tuckahoe boundary will first be filling McKinley, which will be very challenging after Reed opens. I looked at some of the numbers last night, and the only way it works is if McKinley takes all of the Tuckahoe planning units south of Lee Highway and the units on the other side of 66 as well. Tuckahoe will keep its current walkzone, but then the boundaries will move north to the planning units directly above it but primarily east into the current Nottingham zone, with the boundary between Tuckahoe and Discovery probably being units 17910, 17021 and 17033.[/quote]

Oh, and as to the middle school boundary, that is part of what will drive the McKinley boundary north of Lee Highway, because McKinley will need to pick up everything south of Lee Highway right there that isn't walkable to Reed and then will need to pull as much of Tuckahoe from north of Lee Highway as it can reasonably justify to avoid creating a small pocket of McKinley that will go to Williamsburg while everyone else goes to Swanson. This will already make for some funky boundaries for McKinley to the south as it snakes between Reed and Ashlawn, but the less it take from the north the worse those will get, for both McKinley and Ashlawn.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics