Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Sucks for the higher-earning spouse"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This tax bill is about as anti-family as it gets. We are currently engaged. We will see a much bigger tax bill after we get married later this year (I make $130K, DW makes $150K).[/quote] Umm, the marriage tax went away at your income levels with this new tax bill. Under the old tax bill, yes, you would get a big marriage tax penalty. [/quote] SALT deduction is limited to $10K, regardless if single or married. If married, you only get $5K per spouse. That's a big hit. Same with AMT exclusion - $70K for single, only $105K for married couple.[/quote] The AMT exclusion is now higher than it was under the 2017 tax law. For 2017, the AMT exclusion is $54,300 for singles and only $84,500 for married couples. You also missed the AMT exemption phase out piece - The tax overhaul increases the exemption phaseout level -- which is the income level above which you gradually lose your income exemption, until it disappears completely. The phaseout levels were raised to $1 million for joint filers, up from $160,900; and to $500,000 for individuals, up from $120,700. So a lot of households making between $200,000 and $1 million will now get to take full advantage of the exemption levels, whereas before they could not.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics