Reply to Are dead bedrooms inevitable?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Are dead bedrooms inevitable?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm guessing this decline in sexual interest for partnered women [b]evolved from the benefit of not having too many babies[/b] too often.  Once you lose your partner, you rev back up to get another one.[/quote]

That's not how evolution works. To evolve, you have to pass on the trait, i.e., you have to have babies. Also, for thousands of years women did not control whether or not they had sex and had babies. The man was going to fsck his woman whether or not she was "interested". Therefore interest or lack thereof could not be selected for.[/quote]

NP. I disagree. If women with fewer babies in favorable circumstances had more children who survived into adulthood and procreated themselves than women with more kids in unfavorable circumstances, then the latter would have been selected for.

And women's sexual desire has been as much a part of history as rape, even if for the simple fact that men don't particularly love having sex with uninterested sexual partners. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics