Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Courtney Snowden: Still unethical"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Did you actually read the article? This wasn't something she did on a regular basis, there were three incidents. Once she asked (and paid from her own pocket) a staff member to drive her son to a relative's house so the relative could watch him (no explanation in the article for why she needed the staffer to do it). The second time, she asked a staffer to pick him up from school because the staffer had booked her into a meeting when she was supposed to be doing pick-up. The third time she didn't actually ask anyone to watch her son, she left him in her office while she went to a meeting because the relative who was supposed to pick him up had car trouble. The finding by the investigator in that case was that since he was left unattended (at age 8, not 2), it was implied that the staff would supervise him. These are the kinds of binds working parents find themselves in all the time and have to cobble together a solution. Again, she needs to find a better one, but this isn't a case of someone who just doesn't want to pay for childcare dumping her kid on her assistant every day.[/quote] I agree with this. I was expecting much worse when I read the article. The lottery is another story.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics