Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "The Downside of Being Labeled Gifted"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]call into question the practice of labeling[/quote] yes[/quote] It depends. My child is 2E and the “labels” helped him deal with it all.[/quote] Oh, brother :roll: [/quote] ??? Why the eye roll? [/quote] Because the term “twice exceptional” is [i]so[/i] cringeworthy? That’s my guess.[/quote] DP. But why? It s very much a real thing. Now, I think the term is a bit much— I wish they had come up with something different. But the phemonema is real. I have 2 2e kids (ADHD). And both did better once they started AAP, but still really struggled. Panic attacks, getting overwhelmed, doing the the work and not getting it turned in. They felt like something was wrong. Getting the ADHD diagnosis, starting medication, getting a 504, stating tutoring for EF skills— these made such a huge difference. My kids now understand how their brains work, and have developed ways to compensate. And yes, are really glad for a label that explains why they are working differently than everyone else. Both have said they wish they had known earlier. Gifted kids definately have learning disabilities. It is not any less real because you don’t like the term they use to describe it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics