Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Acceptance History for Hooked vs Non-Hooked at top private school "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If anyone wants to look at the numbers across a ton of colleges, they're at the bottom of this document: http://students.hw.com/Portals/44/Handbook2018.pdf [/quote] Hmm, very interesting. They note legacy and athlete and etc. I wonder if the "etc." is URM, they just don't want to put that in writing. [/quote] I doubt there were many. Only 13% of students at HWS were URM- 69% are white and 18% are Asian. 60% participate in athletics. 80% pay the full cost of nearly 40K, which is as expensive as the tuition at a top private school (HWS is a day school, not a boarding school). HWS is also considered the best private school in California, so you can bet that many of the students had legacy status. The numbers feel more reflective of recruited athletes and legacy students than any other group. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
