Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Federal court rules police warrantless tracking of cell phones is unconstitutional"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Good. None of this is good for our civil liberties. - A moderate liberal[/quote] I am also very pleased with this decision. Warrantless use of Stingrays on every citizen must end. This technology never should have been used without a warrant in the first place. My guess is that police outside the ruling's jurisdiction will keep right on using Stingrays on everyone until a court actually forces them to cease and desist.[/quote] My guess is it will eventually end up before the Supreme Court and the conservatives on the court will side with the cops the way they always do.[/quote] Politicizing this issue is a very ignorant thing to do, considering that the Obama administration fought tooth and nail to first keep Stingray "classified" then to defend its blatantly unconstitutional use: https://www.aclu.org/aclu-v-doj-lawsuit-enforce-nsa-warrantless-surveillance-foia-request The reality is: few notable figures from the left OR the right work to protect our civil liberties from government intrusion. Two exceptions (one democrat, one republican) are: Ron Wyden and Rand Paul. More Americans from BOTH parties need to familiarize themselves with these unconstitutional government intrusions, and work together to demand they stop (either by lawsuits or lawmaking).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics