Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Federal court allows plaintiffs records from four competitive high schools including TJ "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]One thing I don't understand is how schools are acting like fisher v Texas settled the law. Given the ages of Kennedy and rbg, if trump puts on two more gorsuch's to replace those two, affirmative action would completely be banned for publics and privates (through the mechanism that any school that takes fed funds cannot discriminate - and the privates all take fed funds through research grants). Unlike Roe v Wade, affirmative action does Not have the same staying power IMO if such a court shift were to happen [/quote] Because for the moment, Fisher is the law. Besides, private schools, like Harvard and Princeton, are held to different standards than public ones. [/quote] The strategy is once the balance on scotus can overturn affirmative action, it'll be expanded to include all schools that take fed funds. Hyp will then have to decide if they want to give up research dollars and fed aid to keep control of admissions policy I get that for the moment fisher is the law - but schools are sounding like it is law until the end of time. Not all scotus rulings have the same staying power. Fisher is not roe [/quote] That's an ... interesting view of law and policy.[/quote] +1. Imagine that. Schools are following the law, as established by SCOTUS. It seems like you are several steps ahead of yourself. [/quote] Colleges/universities must try to avoid using race (typically preference for URMs) in admissions decisions if at all possible in the first place and then only consider race in the least intrusive/discriminatory manner if race is to be considered at all under the fisher. Top universities are not doing this and so that is a problem.[/quote] +1000 [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics