Glad we can relate here. 100% am with you and super saddening to hear what has transpired. It's all about the bottom line for these clubs and they forget we are dealing with kids. Best wishes to your kids in their soccer journey. |
I agree with your points here, but as a counterargument- your player has been scrutinzed every single training session, game and for a whole fall season. No youth player is perfect. You would still be ok with your kid getting replaced from an individual ball mastery evaluation? That kid could easily not be as good as your kid and has only been evaluated by that ball mastery tryout and maybe they had one good game where some director was watching. Not every youth player is going to have 10 good games in a row. |
This is kind of a naive take. Your club is doing a great job in presenting themselves. I'm telling you as an insider. I'm glad you do find trust in your club though. |
I'm with you. All soccer operations should be delayed until we are clear to play. |
| Unfortunately this happened to hit during tryout time. This is really bringing out the worst in people |
Who are you people? Your true most level headed soccer folks I’ve read here ... and maybe met in IRL. So much is wrong in the youth sport industry. Thanks for being a small light. |
Hey Coach, I'm the poster who you replied to here. I just cannot honestly image that this coach would cut a kid (is this on a top team) and replace him with someone he knew NOTHING about other than one ball mastery session. However, you are bringing a director into the picture now. Are you saying this wasn't the coach's decision and this was all done by a director that popped in and watched one game? If this is the case, then, yes, I'd have a very big problem with it and I would hope every parent on the team would have a big problem with it. But if it's as I described and the team coach who sees the kid every session and game cut him and replaced him with no tryout with a kid that was known to the coach (I'm thinking a player that played on a team they played against. Maybe a neighboring club, something like that and he was solid) then I don't have a problem with that, but if a director stepped in and made these changes, I'd be upset for sure. |
Unfortunately, most final tryout selections are done by directors or age group leads. Rarely does a coach every get to handpick their own team. So yes, most of the time, unless the coach is fighting for the kid, your players could be subject to "5 second evals". I agree with you actually now. I would have less of an issue if it was the coach of the team who made the decision. But for the most part, coaches of the team rarely have any hard influence on who is on their team year in and year out. |
|
Thanks! Good luck to you as well. We have managed to meet some really great coaches that get it like you do over the years. Unfortunately, you guys/gals are in the true minority. You actually care about the individual players, development and merit-based advancement. |
| Perhaps a tad off topic but our club has now moved a 3rd kid off our U9 team up to a select U10 team. The reason given is for the benefit of the kids moving up that they need to be challenged more. I have been in coaching for years and have never experienced this. The detriment to our team losing 3 terrific kids has been to make us very uncompetitive with A teams from other clubs. We’ve had to backfill with B players who just aren’t ready for the faster pace of play. I’ve posed the question to our club this effect of this is very demoralizing to our players and parents and we’ve already lost players who want to play sports on teams that are more competitive with the teams they play. The question I have is if the older select teams are so “select” why do they need younger kids to fill their rosters? I’ve contacted other clubs (large clubs) and they all say they highly discourage moving up. I am suspect that our club is short players on the older teams and they are poaching better younger kids to fill rosters. My observation is smaller clubs have difficulty finding enough kids for select teams so bring up younger better kids but the effect on the younger teams is they are short of quality players and become uncompetitive. |
Yeah, having dealt with this some of this as an assistant travel coach over 2 years, I would say the smarter play is just have the younger players guest player for the older group instead of moving 3 players up to fill slots. Then have the club double down on recruiting the 10 year olds to come out. When they take away your 3 best players, then that can demoralize your team and cause division also when other girls ask why the 3 best girls left. Also, your 3 best girls probably art really ready to move up to 9v9 with full offsides and the ball flying in the air a lot more and significantly larger kids. They would get more touches on the ball remaining at 7v7 thus enhancing their ball mastery skills. Someone has to get out to Rec and surrounding elementary school recruit new players into the club. |