Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not about his personal views. Spencer is a very public figure who is vocal about his antiquates beliefs. He advertises and monetizes his prejudice and hatred - it's not some private dinner table ideas.

Well ok, but how do you define "hatred?" Does opposing same-sex marriage make one a hater?(Buchanan and Ken Cuccinelli fall into this camp) Or is i just racist comments that would make someone a hater?

I'm biracial. He thinks people like me are unnatural. I feel pretty confident that this qualifies as him hating me and people like me.

But why should holding this view get his gym membership revoked?

DP.. you're being dense. If most of the members find him offensive and feel uncomfortable with him being there, then the gym made a business decision to remove that person. And no, it's not the same thing as removing a minority or a gay person from a membership.

Paleo is just regurgitating from his alt right reading. I think a direct copy of this. Advise. Do better research. Think more for yourself.

https://altright.com/2017/05/22/crazy-cat-lady-professor-harrases-alt-right-leader-richard-spencer-at-gym/
What has the world come to that a White man can’t even be left alone to make gains in peace? Naturally, the Free Market sided with a psychopathic post-menopausal schitzo. Richard got banned, and she did not. But there is a ray of good news.

I don't read AltRight stuff. I read Chronicles Magazine, The American Conservative, The American Interest, The Imaginitive Conservative, and The Orthosphere

Add one or two left leaning sources. To balance. NPR? Think and compare the views of different sources. Right now you sound like a parrot without a fully formed frontal lobe.

https://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/510533/rebranding-white-nationalism-inside-the-alt-right/

And this

http://thepointnews.com/2017/03/steve-bannon-from-rebranding-white-nationalism-to-advising-the-president

Perhaps this can help you understand the concern over normalizing people like Spencer and even Bannon

https://www.google.com/amp/www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2016/12/7/13802640/white-nationalists-alt-right-racism-bannon-spencer-trump

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before long, Right-wingers will have to establish private gyms exclusively for Right-wingers.

[/b]

A girl can dream...

It would be nice if we could have that kind of exclusivity! But you can bet as soon as we tried to set up any kind of membership based group that discriminated against and didn't admit others based on things like politics, liberals would sue us faster than you can say "yoga".

So things will remain status quo - where RW'ers can be discriminated against at-will, but never get to do any discriminating of our own, lest we be sued.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before long, Right-wingers will have to establish private gyms exclusively for Right-wingers.

[/b]

A girl can dream...

It would be nice if we could have that kind of exclusivity! But you can bet as soon as we tried to set up any kind of membership based group that discriminated against and didn't admit others based on things like politics, liberals would sue us faster than you can say "yoga".

So things will remain status quo - where RW'ers can be discriminated against at-will, but never get to do any discriminating of our own, lest we be sued.

Yeah I think you might wanna stick with the status quo. You keep that white supremacist shit to yourself or expect to get your ass whupped. Ain't no safe space for you if I hear that shit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before long, Right-wingers will have to establish private gyms exclusively for Right-wingers.

[/b]

A girl can dream...

It would be nice if we could have that kind of exclusivity! But you can bet as soon as we tried to set up any kind of membership based group that discriminated against and didn't admit others based on things like politics, liberals would sue us faster than you can say "yoga".

So things will remain status quo - where RW'ers can be discriminated against at-will, but never get to do any discriminating of our own, lest we be sued.

Yeah I think you might wanna stick with the status quo. You keep that white supremacist shit to yourself or expect to get your ass whupped. Ain't no safe space for you if I hear that shit.

Spencer's a nut. White supremacist. Nazi

Spencer has repeatedly quoted from Nazi propaganda and denounced Jews, and has on several occasions refused to denounce Adolf Hitler.

Spencer and his organization drew considerable media attention in the weeks following the 2016 presidential election, where, at a National Policy Institute conference, in response to his cry "Hail Trump, hail our people, hail victory!", a number of his supporters gave the Nazi salute and chanted in a similar fashion to the Sieg heil chant used at the Nazis' Nuremberg rallies. Spencer has defended their conduct, stating that the Nazi salute was given in a spirit of "irony and exuberance".[11]


Is that a threat?

Are you suggesting that I face some kind of physical danger from you? Is that what you're saying?


Please elaborate. Because this forum has rules, and I expect them to be enforced. And you need to be banned.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before long, Right-wingers will have to establish private gyms exclusively for Right-wingers.

[/b]

A girl can dream...

It would be nice if we could have that kind of exclusivity! But you can bet as soon as we tried to set up any kind of membership based group that discriminated against and didn't admit others based on things like politics, liberals would sue us faster than you can say "yoga".

So things will remain status quo - where RW'ers can be discriminated against at-will, but never get to do any discriminating of our own, lest we be sued.

Yeah I think you might wanna stick with the status quo. You keep that white supremacist shit to yourself or expect to get your ass whupped. Ain't no safe space for you if I hear that shit.

Spencer's a nut. White supremacist. Nazi

Spencer has repeatedly quoted from Nazi propaganda and denounced Jews, and has on several occasions refused to denounce Adolf Hitler.

Spencer and his organization drew considerable media attention in the weeks following the 2016 presidential election, where, at a National Policy Institute conference, in response to his cry "Hail Trump, hail our people, hail victory!", a number of his supporters gave the Nazi salute and chanted in a similar fashion to the Sieg heil chant used at the Nazis' Nuremberg rallies. Spencer has defended their conduct, stating that the Nazi salute was given in a spirit of "irony and exuberance".[11]


Is that a threat?

Are you suggesting that I face some kind of physical danger from you? Is that what you're saying?


Please elaborate. Because this forum has rules, and I expect them to be enforced. And you need to be banned.

Agreed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not about his personal views. Spencer is a very public figure who is vocal about his antiquates beliefs. He advertises and monetizes his prejudice and hatred - it's not some private dinner table ideas.

Well ok, but how do you define "hatred?" Does opposing same-sex marriage make one a hater?(Buchanan and Ken Cuccinelli fall into this camp) Or is i just racist comments that would make someone a hater?

I'm biracial. He thinks people like me are unnatural. I feel pretty confident that this qualifies as him hating me and people like me.

But why should holding this view get his gym membership revoked?

DP.. you're being dense. If most of the members find him offensive and feel uncomfortable with him being there, then the gym made a business decision to remove that person. And no, it's not the same thing as removing a minority or a gay person from a membership.

Paleo is just regurgitating from his alt right reading. I think a direct copy of this. Advise. Do better research. Think more for yourself.

https://altright.com/2017/05/22/crazy-cat-lady-professor-harrases-alt-right-leader-richard-spencer-at-gym/
What has the world come to that a White man can’t even be left alone to make gains in peace? Naturally, the Free Market sided with a psychopathic post-menopausal schitzo. Richard got banned, and she did not. But there is a ray of good news.

I don't read AltRight stuff. I read Chronicles Magazine, The American Conservative, The American Interest, The Imaginitive Conservative, and The Orthosphere

Add one or two left leaning sources. To balance. NPR? Think and compare the views of different sources. Right now you sound like a parrot without a fully formed frontal lobe.

https://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/510533/rebranding-white-nationalism-inside-the-alt-right/

And this

http://thepointnews.com/2017/03/steve-bannon-from-rebranding-white-nationalism-to-advising-the-president

Perhaps this can help you understand the concern over normalizing people like Spencer and even Bannon

https://www.google.com/amp/www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2016/12/7/13802640/white-nationalists-alt-right-racism-bannon-spencer-trump

The problem with low brow teen semi intellectuals is that they are afraid of challenging their beliefs. College will be tough.

Pales here
I do occasionally look at NPR, and the Atlantic publishes some interesting stuff. I was just giving you guys an idea of what I read regularly. I'll certainly get my views challenged at St. John's, but all of the classes are discussion based. No indoctrination

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is not about his personal views. Spencer is a very public figure who is vocal about his antiquates beliefs. He advertises and monetizes his prejudice and hatred - it's not some private dinner table ideas.

Well ok, but how do you define "hatred?" Does opposing same-sex marriage make one a hater?(Buchanan and Ken Cuccinelli fall into this camp) Or is i just racist comments that would make someone a hater?

I'm biracial. He thinks people like me are unnatural. I feel pretty confident that this qualifies as him hating me and people like me.

But why should holding this view get his gym membership revoked?

DP.. you're being dense. If most of the members find him offensive and feel uncomfortable with him being there, then the gym made a business decision to remove that person. And no, it's not the same thing as removing a minority or a gay person from a membership.

Paleo is just regurgitating from his alt right reading. I think a direct copy of this. Advise. Do better research. Think more for yourself.

https://altright.com/2017/05/22/crazy-cat-lady-professor-harrases-alt-right-leader-richard-spencer-at-gym/
What has the world come to that a White man can’t even be left alone to make gains in peace? Naturally, the Free Market sided with a psychopathic post-menopausal schitzo. Richard got banned, and she did not. But there is a ray of good news.

I don't read AltRight stuff. I read Chronicles Magazine, The American Conservative, The American Interest, The Imaginitive Conservative, and The Orthosphere

Add one or two left leaning sources. To balance. NPR? Think and compare the views of different sources. Right now you sound like a parrot without a fully formed frontal lobe.

https://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/510533/rebranding-white-nationalism-inside-the-alt-right/

And this

http://thepointnews.com/2017/03/steve-bannon-from-rebranding-white-nationalism-to-advising-the-president

Perhaps this can help you understand the concern over normalizing people like Spencer and even Bannon

https://www.google.com/amp/www.vox.com/platform/amp/identities/2016/12/7/13802640/white-nationalists-alt-right-racism-bannon-spencer-trump

The problem with low brow teen semi intellectuals is that they are afraid of challenging their beliefs. College will be tough.

Pales here
I do occasionally look at NPR, and the Atlantic publishes some interesting stuff. I was just giving you guys an idea of what I read regularly. I'll certainly get my views challenged at St. John's, but all of the classes are discussion based. No indoctrination

Sure.... according to wiki. A former writer of one of your trash sources

From March to December 2007, Spencer was assistant editor at The American Conservative magazine. According to founding editor Scott McConnell, Spencer was fired from The American Conservative because his views were considered too extreme.[13] From January 2008 to December 2009, he was executive editor of Taki's Magazine.[18]

In March 2010, Spencer founded AlternativeRight.com, a website he edited until 2012. He has stated that he created the term alt-right.[9]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before long, Right-wingers will have to establish private gyms exclusively for Right-wingers.

[/b]

A girl can dream...

It would be nice if we could have that kind of exclusivity! But you can bet as soon as we tried to set up any kind of membership based group that discriminated against and didn't admit others based on things like politics, liberals would sue us faster than you can say "yoga".

So things will remain status quo - where RW'ers can be discriminated against at-will, but never get to do any discriminating of our own, lest we be sued.

Yeah I think you might wanna stick with the status quo. You keep that white supremacist shit to yourself or expect to get your ass whupped. Ain't no safe space for you if I hear that shit.

Is that a threat?

Are you suggesting that I face some kind of physical danger from you? Is that what you're saying?


Please elaborate. Because this forum has rules, and I expect them to be enforced. And you need to be banned.

Anonymous wrote:Because he creates a hostile work environment for minorities employed at the gym.

Anonymous wrote:I heard this woman on NPR and didn't know what the segment was about, but I immediately thought: Psychotic cat lady loon who is DESPERATE for confrontation & attention.

I don't think she's working with a full deck and the media should ignore her. Ditto Richard Spencer. There are no winners in this story.

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because he creates a hostile work environment for minorities employed at the gym.

How? If he's not insulting them or hurting them?