Anonymous wrote:Do you old timers really think anyone today cares about an affair the a candidate's spouse had in the 1970's? Gennifer will make an ass of very old self.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:If any or all of Bill's lovers and/or victims shows up, what would be the reaction if Hillary were to make a statement admitting that she is upset about it, that she was badly hurt by Bill many times, that they were the worst part of the marriage and she was not proud of everything she did in response, but that she married him for better or worse, and despite the many times things were worse than she had anticipated, she still takes that vow seriously, and she still loves him despite his flaws?

And refrains from attacking Trump's sex life, which is the least relevant of his flaws as a presidential candidate!

Bravo... that is what I was think. I just want to add one more thing. She should also say that Trump knowingly invited them to hurt her personally and that is what he does even if his opponent might be right and the Presidential debate is far from personal feud. She should point out how Trump attacked the disabled leader, Mr. Khan, Rosie O'donell etc. when their differences were not personal.

Then she shouldn't have offered Cuban a front row seat.

She started this battle. If Trump fights back, it's a popcorn show for sure!

But you still want her to lie about how she still loves him and takes her vow seriously? lol

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:If any or all of Bill's lovers and/or victims shows up, what would be the reaction if Hillary were to make a statement admitting that she is upset about it, that she was badly hurt by Bill many times, that they were the worst part of the marriage and she was not proud of everything she did in response, but that she married him for better or worse, and despite the many times things were worse than she had anticipated, she still takes that vow seriously, and she still loves him despite his flaws?

And refrains from attacking Trump's sex life, which is the least relevant of his flaws as a presidential candidate!

Bravo... that is what I was think. I just want to add one more thing. She should also say that Trump knowingly invited them to hurt her personally and that is what he does even if his opponent might be right and the Presidential debate is far from personal feud. She should point out how Trump attacked the disabled leader, Mr. Khan, Rosie O'donell etc. when their differences were not personal.

Then she shouldn't have offered Cuban a front row seat.

She started this battle. If Trump fights back, it's a popcorn show for sure!

But you still want her to lie about how she still loves him and takes her vow seriously? lol

I won't defend her invitation to Cuban, although it would not totally surprise me if her campaign gamed it the way it played out, and figure Flowers being there would bring out public sympathy (especially among women) for a candidate who can use it. However, I think a more apt comeback from Trump would be having people like Giuliani front and center.

Anonymous wrote:Trump supporters loved the response. Hillary shills of course are hyper-critical of anything resembling humor from the other side. Nobody is inspired by Hillary, it's all phony praise.

Anonymous wrote:Pathetic that liberals don't seen to know the Hillary instigated with inviting mark Cuban first.

Anonymous wrote:GENNIFER FLOWERS: I want to come...
BROADDRICK: I want to come too!
PAULA JONES: What about me?

Anonymous wrote:Kellyanne Conway did not have to walk anything back.. Trump never said Flowers would be there. He said "perhaps I should......."

Anonymous wrote:You guys read all the articles about Kellyanne Conway totally walking this idea back, right?

That woman has the hardest job in the world right now... making Trump look sane.