Anonymous wrote:If this "President" wants to nominate a replacement, he's going to have to play ball. He's going to have to nominate someone that McConnell or Ryan would nominate themselves.

Obama should look to the Judicial Conference of the United States, the policy making arm of the Federal Judiciary. Pick people the Chief Justice has blessed, by picking them for key leadership slots.

Bill Traxler, the current Chair of the Executive Committee, would be fabulous. A Bush 41 appointee to the District bench out of South Carolina, Strom Thurmond strong armed Clinton (during impeachment) into elevating Traxler to the 4th Circuit bench. So it would "close the circle" for this Senate to force Obama to his knees, elevating an anti-criminal budget hawk as the best he can do.

Julie Robinson of Kansas, a Bush 43 appointee, would be a terrific choice also. She is a black female federal judge so it would be hard for the liberals to complain. But she has been a great help in passing sensible anti-abortion policies (while hammering ACLU!!!), as well as nailing the Brady campaign on procedural grounds.

If Obama decides to nominate some "Guest of our country" like Goodwind Liu, he'll fail. But if he bargains with Mitch, he can still get a marginal improvement over Scalia, and over a President Cruz nominee.

Obama needs to take what he can get!

Anonymous wrote:If this "President" wants to nominate a replacement, he's going to have to play ball. He's going to have to nominate someone that McConnell or Ryan would nominate themselves.

Obama should look to the Judicial Conference of the United States, the policy making arm of the Federal Judiciary. Pick people the Chief Justice has blessed, by picking them for key leadership slots.

Bill Traxler, the current Chair of the Executive Committee, would be fabulous. A Bush 41 appointee to the District bench out of South Carolina, Strom Thurmond strong armed Clinton (during impeachment) into elevating Traxler to the 4th Circuit bench. So it would "close the circle" for this Senate to force Obama to his knees, elevating an anti-criminal budget hawk as the best he can do.

Julie Robinson of Kansas, a Bush 43 appointee, would be a terrific choice also. She is a black female federal judge so it would be hard for the liberals to complain. But she has been a great help in passing sensible anti-abortion policies (while hammering ACLU!!!), as well as nailing the Brady campaign on procedural grounds.

If Obama decides to nominate some "Guest of our country" like Goodwind Liu, he'll fail. But if he bargains with Mitch, he can still get a marginal improvement over Scalia, and over a President Cruz nominee.

Obama needs to take what he can get!

Anonymous wrote:
Obama needs to take what he can get!

Anonymous wrote:If this "President" wants to nominate a replacement, he's going to have to play ball. He's going to have to nominate someone that McConnell or Ryan would nominate themselves.

Obama should look to the Judicial Conference of the United States, the policy making arm of the Federal Judiciary. Pick people the Chief Justice has blessed, by picking them for key leadership slots.

Bill Traxler, the current Chair of the Executive Committee, would be fabulous. A Bush 41 appointee to the District bench out of South Carolina, Strom Thurmond strong armed Clinton (during impeachment) into elevating Traxler to the 4th Circuit bench. So it would "close the circle" for this Senate to force Obama to his knees, elevating an anti-criminal budget hawk as the best he can do.

Julie Robinson of Kansas, a Bush 43 appointee, would be a terrific choice also. She is a black female federal judge so it would be hard for the liberals to complain. But she has been a great help in passing sensible anti-abortion policies (while hammering ACLU!!!), as well as nailing the Brady campaign on procedural grounds.

If Obama decides to nominate some "Guest of our country" like Goodwind Liu, he'll fail. But if he bargains with Mitch, he can still get a marginal improvement over Scalia, and over a President Cruz nominee.

Obama needs to take what he can get!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Republicans will stall and delay and wait until a Republican gets into office and then will put someone like Phil Robertson in the Supreme Court.

Clown post, bro.

PaleoConPrep wrote:Obama will not appoint Scalias replacement. I can assure you 100% that the Republican Senate will not let it happen. The replacement will depend on who wins POTUS. I vote for Roy Moore. He would make a fine justice.

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:Obama will not appoint Scalias replacement. I can assure you 100% that the Republican Senate will not let it happen. The replacement will depend on who wins POTUS. I vote for Roy Moore. He would make a fine justice.

Alabama and the Ten Commandments. Yeah, he'd be perfect.

PaleoConPrep wrote:Obama will not appoint Scalias replacement. I can assure you 100% that the Republican Senate will not let it happen. The replacement will depend on who wins POTUS. I vote for Roy Moore. He would make a fine justice.

PaleoConPrep wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

PaleoConPrep wrote:Obama will not appoint Scalias replacement. I can assure you 100% that the Republican Senate will not let it happen. The replacement will depend on who wins POTUS. I vote for Roy Moore. He would make a fine justice.

Alabama and the Ten Commandments. Yeah, he'd be perfect.

What's wrong with Alabama and the 10 Commandments? The people will ultimately decide. Everything depends on the election.If Trump or Cruz are elected President, I think Moore has a good shot.

What's wrong with Alabama and the 10 Commandments? The people will ultimately decide. Everything depends on the election.If Trump or Cruz are elected President, I think Moore has a good shot.