UK prohibits claims that creationism has scientific basis in gov't funded schools

FruminousBandersnatch
Member Offline
According to the UK government:

"[Creationism] does not accord with the scientific consensus or the very large body of established scientific evidence; nor does it accurately and consistently employ the scientific method, and as such it should not be presented to pupils at the Academy as a scientific theory," the agreement states.

The funding agreement notes that the discussion of beliefs about the origin of the Earth including creationism are permitted in religious education "as long as it is not presented as a valid alternative to established scientific theory."


So it's ok to teach creationism as religion, which it is, but you can't teach it as science, which it isn't.

Read more: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2014/06/18/Teaching-creationism-as-scientifically-valid-now-banned-in-all-UK-public-schools/5631403128922/#ixzz357aySEAq
Anonymous
Good for them. There is no scientific support for an earth that is 10,000 years old.
Anonymous
APPLAUSE.

A country that won't give sway to propaganda.
Anonymous
Thank goodness for that...
Anonymous
We should do the same here. Teach whatever you like (provided it's otherwise legal) but prohibit quackery from being taught as fact.
Anonymous
Big Bang is religion too. Only goofier.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Big Bang is religion too. Only goofier.


Are you retarded?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:We should do the same here. Teach whatever you like (provided it's otherwise legal) but prohibit quackery from being taught as fact.


Crap , just teach math , reading, writing and grammar. Our schools have no business teaching anything else until the kids are proficient .
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Big Bang is religion too. Only goofier.


Are you retarded?


Are you gay ?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:APPLAUSE.

A country that won't give sway to propaganda.


B.S. They teach global warming. The stupidest propaganda of the last 2 centuries.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Good for them. There is no scientific support for an earth that is 10,000 years old.

Yes there is. According to Australia's government, the foundation of the Great Barrier Reef is around 600,000 years old, and the current corals forming it are 9,000 years old, so the earth could not be only 6,000 years old, unless the Great Barrier Reef is somehow older than the Earth.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good for them. There is no scientific support for an earth that is 10,000 years old.

Yes there is. According to Australia's government, the foundation of the Great Barrier Reef is around 600,000 years old, and the current corals forming it are 9,000 years old, so the earth could not be only 6,000 years old, unless the Great Barrier Reef is somehow older than the Earth.

Pp here. The text that is obscured by dots is "According to Australia's government, the foundation of the Great Barrier Reef is around 600,000 years old, and the current corals forming it are 9,000 years old".
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Big Bang is religion too. Only goofier.


Big Bang is religion too. Only with evidence.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good for them. There is no scientific support for an earth that is 10,000 years old.

Yes there is. According to Australia's government, the foundation of the Great Barrier Reef is around 600,000 years old, and the current corals forming it are 9,000 years old, so the earth could not be only 6,000 years old, unless the Great Barrier Reef is somehow older than the Earth.

Pp here. The text that is obscured by dots is "According to Australia's government, the foundation of the Great Barrier Reef is around 600,000 years old, and the current corals forming it are 9,000 years old".

Nevermind. I misunderstood the post as saying that the earth was younger than 10,000 years old, not the other way around. My bad.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: