Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't believe that not covering gray hairs is a sign that a woman has given up on her looks. And, it disappoints me when other women say that.

I'm 42 with a fair amount of gray. My hair is light brown with some natural highlights so the gray pretty much blends in. Its fun to see my hair getting lighter. And, to me its not worth the time and money to cover my gray. I might feel differently if my hair was darker.

I have to disagree with this statement. Sorry, but when a woman is still relatively young (not a Sr. Citizen) and still fairly attractive, but is too lazy to color her hair, it just shows that she is too lazy to make the effort to invest in herself and her appearance. Being pretty takes more time, effort and money as you get older and if a woman starts getting sloppy it shows.

Anonymous wrote:I don't believe that not covering gray hairs is a sign that a woman has given up on her looks. And, it disappoints me when other women say that.

I'm 42 with a fair amount of gray. My hair is light brown with some natural highlights so the gray pretty much blends in. Its fun to see my hair getting lighter. And, to me its not worth the time and money to cover my gray. I might feel differently if my hair was darker.

Anonymous wrote:I'm 51 and don't dye. As a working mother, I just don't know where I'd find the time. Clothes I can buy on the internet. But you can not dye your hair on the internet. Sometimes, I even let my hair grow out too much before I get it cut. I am ashamed of this, but have no idea how I would find the time to do otherwise. Maybe I should shave my head and wear a wig.

Anonymous wrote:No wonder dc is so ugly the women don't even try

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:Sorry to tell you ladies, but S&P and even fully grey can be visually intoxicating.