Guess the running mate?

Anonymous
Step right up ladies and gentlemen...cast your votes for the McCain and Obama running mates, respectively.

McCain with Condy Rice (but that would never happen)...but more realistically - Sara Palin

Obama with Biden (perfect pair because they both say stupid things)


Any takers...
Anonymous
McCain:
- Meg Whitman, if he wants a potential game changer of a running mate
- Lieberman or a pro-choice Republican if he wants to tick off the far right and emphasize his credentials as a free thinker
- Romney if he wants to tweak Huckabee and stress his openmindedness on religion, and he can get past his lack of chemistry with Romney
- Bobby Jindal if he wants to give up slamming Obama on lack of experience, which he doesn't
- Tim Pawlenty or Lindsey Graham if he wants a safe pick

Obama:
- Joe Biden if he's feeling less confident than he was two months ago (though Biden undercuts the change message more than Hillary would)
- Evan Bayh if, again, he's feeling less confident (but today's well-timed oppo hit on Bayh may knock him out of the running)
- Jack Reed if he wants military and national security experience without a lot of baggage (but with no excitement)
- Tim Kaine if he's feeling cocky
- Kathleen Sebelius if he's feeling really cocky
- Hillary Clinton if he really wants to win and his ego allows it, which it won't

I think it will be Biden for Obama. McCain will be able to factor in Obama's choice in making his own, so I'll hold off on guessing McCain's running mate until Obama makes his choice public.
Anonymous
Still hoping for the "Dream Team", Obama-Clinton ticket. It would be a slam-dunk...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Still hoping for the "Dream Team", Obama-Clinton ticket. It would be a slam-dunk...


It would only guarantee that I not vote for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Still hoping for the "Dream Team", Obama-Clinton ticket. It would be a slam-dunk...


It would only guarantee that I not vote for him.



so........
Anonymous
Obama with Biden (perfect pair because they both say stupid things)


Any takers...

Gee, let me guess, you're a McSame supporter...at least Obama remembers what he says 5 minutes before, & can tell the difference between Sunnis & the Shiites.
Anonymous
As a former Delaware resident and someone who has met Biden many times, I shudder to think that the country would say about an Obama/Biden ticket. Biden is the quintessential inside the beltway politician...very intellectual but a blowhard of the highest degree.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Still hoping for the "Dream Team", Obama-Clinton ticket. It would be a slam-dunk...


I think it would be a brilliant move on Obama's part. Obama/Clinton would dominate the campaign and win handily.

From John Nichols at The Nation, one of the leading progressive publications:

This column has been pondering and predicting an Obama-Biden ticket for some time now. That's still the best bet, and now that the announcement is finally imminent, everyone is talking about it.

So, what the heck, let's run the Hillary Clinton scenario one more time:

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton like one another. Obama had Clinton's cell number on speed dial, and vice versa. They maintained stable, even good, personal relations during the primary campaign. When things got ugly, Obama stepped up several times to defend Clinton, and the senator from New York got what might have been the loudest and most sincere round of the campaign when she seemed to suggest at the close of a contentious primary-season debate that she would be willing to join an Obama-led "dream ticket."

But we always knew that the "what to do with Bill Clinton" challenge would steer Obama away from an easy or casual selection of Hillary Clinton as his vice presidential running mate. Again and again through the primary season, it was Bill who said things that seemed to inflame the competition and move both camps to their respective corners. And, of course, there is the fundamental question of where to put an ex-president in an administration that supposed to be all about change.

So the line became: Obama would only pick Clinton if he comes to the conclusion that he needs her badly enough to accept not only his former rival but the complexities that her husband brings to the equation and, of course, their considerable baggage.

Well, the latest polls seem to suggest that Obama finds himself in a circumstance that lends itself to the Clinton consideration.
Despite the fact that the miserable state of the U.S. economy shaped by eight years of oilman budgeting should be handing the election to Obama, he's either tied or behind in a number of key state and national surveys. The new Reuters/Zogby poll has Republican John McCain leading Obama 46-41. Gallup and LA Times surveys have it much closer, with Obama slightly up. But these are not encouraging number for the Democrats.

Russian tanks in Georgia, regime change in Pakistan and the general uncertainty about whether to worry more about a new Cold War or the mismanagement of the old war on terror seems to have caused a good many Americans to edge toward McCain. That may not be reasonable, or smart or fair. But, to employ the phrase of the season, "It is what it is."

Barack Obama might just need Hillary Clinton.

Clinton, whether appropriately or not, seen by a great many Americans as someone who knows her way around the international stage. In fact, members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who are not fans of Clinton have told me that she has far better international connections than McCain or Obama.

She also has some pretty good connections in the swing states of Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Then there is the whole "dream ticket" thing.

If Obama takes the stage in front of the Old State Capital in Springfield, Illinois, Saturday with Evan Bayh at his side, it will be news -- but not very exciting news. If he does so with Joe Biden, it will be bigger news -- but it's not like Biden brings the "wow" factor.

If Obama takes the stage with Clinton at his side, it will be the dominant news story of the weekend, the convention and perhaps of the fall campaign.

Indeed, it could create that wave of excitement that Obama needs to have not just a triumphal convention but a triumphal campaign.

So that's the Hillary Clinton scenario, with all of its challenges, complexities and unpleasantnesses.

One does not have to like Clinton, or even believe that Clinton will ultimately join a "dream ticket," to suspect that as the Obama camp reviews the latest polls, they might be spinning the scenario one last time. Obama and his aides may reject the option -- because of Bill, because the former First Lady does not say "change," or because of concerns that a ticket made up of an African-American man and a woman might be too much change for the electorate.


But let's presume, out of respect for the savvy of the Obama team, that they are considering it.
Anonymous
15:05/14:49 again. So sorry about an error in the 14:49 post. The last sentence should be inside the quotes; they're Nichols' words, not mine.
Anonymous
Obama goes with Bayh, it's safe. Didn't see the editorial, where did it run? Can you link to it? Thanks. I still think Obama/Clinton is interesting, though I have never been a huge fan (of her, that is) but it is interesting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Still hoping for the "Dream Team", Obama-Clinton ticket. It would be a slam-dunk...


It would only guarantee that I not vote for him.



If Obama decides to grace Hillary by putting her name next to his on the ballot than I think McCain would have a field day with accusing him of flip flopping/hypocrite since Obama and Hillary were so contentious for so long and now all of the sudden they would be buddy-buddy (or Pres and VP).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Still hoping for the "Dream Team", Obama-Clinton ticket. It would be a slam-dunk...


It would only guarantee that I not vote for him.



If Obama decides to grace Hillary by putting her name next to his on the ballot than I think McCain would have a field day with accusing him of flip flopping/hypocrite since Obama and Hillary were so contentious for so long and now all of the sudden they would be buddy-buddy (or Pres and VP).


I'm the poster who added the Nichols piece and gave my list above. Sorry I forgot the link: http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters/346742

I actually think Obama could use very effectively the parallel of Lincoln building his "team of rivals," especially given that Obama will kick off his trip to Denver in Springfield. The second parallel is JFK/Johnson. He would instantly appear to be an even larger figure, one who recognizes his rivals' strengths and makes them part of the team for the greater good. The most effective leaders are those who are able to set aside their differences and join their strengths in service to something larger than themselves. As for change, there could be no greater change than a black man and a woman joining together to help our party regain the White House.

McCain and Hillary are good friends and I'm sure he recognizes the strength of an Obama/Hillary ticket. Obama and Hillary are friends. The problem has always been Bill. But now that Bill sees there's no chance of his wife overshadowing him this time around, I think he would be in a better position to control some of his narcissism. I've known him 20 years and I love him, but he's a piece of work!

I'm not saying Obama will do this. But I am saying that it would be an unstoppable ticket. They are electrifying together. McCain would simply be unable to compete with them, regardless of who he taps as his running mate. They would dominate the narrative straight through November. Biden or Bayh are nice safe choices but they bring no magic and no excitement to the ticket (and I think Obama and Biden would have some ego issues too). If he picks one of them and McCain goes for someone like Meg Whitman, we're going to have a struggle on our hands. I want a slam dunk, as a PP said. This is the slam dunk.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:McCain:
- Meg Whitman, if he wants a potential game changer of a running mate
- Lieberman or a pro-choice Republican if he wants to tick off the far right and emphasize his credentials as a free thinker
- Romney if he wants to tweak Huckabee and stress his openmindedness on religion, and he can get past his lack of chemistry with Romney
- Bobby Jindal if he wants to give up slamming Obama on lack of experience, which he doesn't
- Tim Pawlenty or Lindsey Graham if he wants a safe pick

Obama:
- Joe Biden if he's feeling less confident than he was two months ago (though Biden undercuts the change message more than Hillary would)
- Evan Bayh if, again, he's feeling less confident (but today's well-timed oppo hit on Bayh may knock him out of the running)
- Jack Reed if he wants military and national security experience without a lot of baggage (but with no excitement)
- Tim Kaine if he's feeling cocky
- Kathleen Sebelius if he's feeling really cocky
- Hillary Clinton if he really wants to win and his ego allows it, which it won't

I think it will be Biden for Obama. McCain will be able to factor in Obama's choice in making his own, so I'll hold off on guessing McCain's running mate until Obama makes his choice public.


OK, time for your McCain prediction. Let's hear it! (Love your post BTW.)
Rich
Member Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:McCain:...
- Tim Pawlenty or Lindsey Graham if he wants a safe pick

I think the rumors about Graham being gay take him out of the "safe" category. But he's one of McCain's closest friends and strongest supporters. He would certainly be a gutsy choice.
Anonymous
How about McCain and Alan Keyes ticket?

...that would diffuse the "historic" moment that the Dems/media keeping going on and on about.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: