Michelle Obama and Jill Biden booed at Nascar race

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Empress MIchelle's husband and none of her family has served in the US miklitary. At least, Jill Biden's step son has served. In any case, what office does either hold that should be respected? None. Michelle serves dinner to the homeless in $500.00 athletic shoes. For the honeless and hungry, I offer thanks for the crumbs from your table, Empress Bountiful. Also the veteran and his family were not booed. Another fact is that the "rednecks" you look down on are the ones who make up a large segment of the military. When you've served your country in its armed forces then you have the right to criticize, until then, shut up. Speaking as someone whose family has served this country in the military and diplomatic corps for many generations.


Sorry, but I will rely on the Constitution for my rights to free speech rather than your conditions. I will criticize whomever I damn well please. Right now, I feel like criticizing you. Michelle Obama has more class in her pinky then you have in your entire body.


In this season of Thanksgiving, I have yet another thing to give thanks for, that iI have never seen, nor will ever see, your entire body, clothed or naked, nor The pinky of Empress.


Oh please tell me you are not a dude. Because if you are, you are embarrassing yourself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
With the super wankers failing to reach an agreement on the budget, the automatic cuts are scheduled to take a chunk out of the military's hide. We will be hearing a lot from conservatives about how this is tragedy that must be reversed and how liberals don't support the military. But, this episode shows just how little conservatives really care about those who serve their country.


Booing is only the tip of the iceberg.
The supercommittee, at the behest of Republicans such as John McCain, has been advocating cutting the military's health care benefits. Because while the interests of Raytheon, Lockheed Martin are sacrosanct, the actual people who serve are there to be thrown under the bus. Remember McCain was also the guy who opposed the GI bill on grounds that we can't afford it.

http://www.insurance-forums.net/forum/senior-insurance-forum/tricare-super-committee-you-serious-t36369.html

Watch it on Colbert, and laugh...or cry?

http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/thu-november-17-2011-susan-orlean
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/11/18/1037675/-Stephen-Colbert-RIPS-Super-Congress-for-screwing-with-veterans

If you're a service member and you vote Republican, you are only getting what you deserve



Do you not understand that the president and Panetta support changes to Tricare? Colbert doesn't seem to get it either. I'm a Democrat, BTW. Google the NYT and Tricare to read more about this.


Yeah, but unlike the GOP, the Dems aren't constantly putting on the mantle of defenders of the military as an excuse to funnel money to their defense contractor patrons while screwing the people who actually do the fighting.
Anonymous
People with class and proper upbringing should/would never do this publicly. Parents, just count this as another opportunity to teach our children to respect our country's leaders, even if they do act like imbeciles at times. Shameful what happened, and I'm a leaning-Republican (although I have voted Democrat plenty of times).
Anonymous
Get some perspective people. This kind of crap al the time. It doesn't make it right, but don't get all in a tither just because it is an Obama on the receiving end.
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:Personally I think anyone can boo whomever they want to boo. Moreover, I would not only expect conservatives to disagree with Mrs. Obama and Dr. Biden, I understand their disagreement. But, in this case, the two women were standing with a veteran and his family and Obama and Biden were there to promote military families. So, I don't think the story is a bunch of yahoos booing two women that I would expect them to boo. Rather, it is the fact that a crowd of red-blooded American patriots decided to boo a veteran during an effort to rally support for military families. If it had been liberals booing the military, Fox News would have it on endless loop and Congress would be considering a resolution of condemnation.

With the super wankers failing to reach an agreement on the budget, the automatic cuts are scheduled to take a chunk out of the military's hide. We will be hearing a lot from conservatives about how this is tragedy that must be reversed and how liberals don't support the military. But, this episode shows just how little conservatives really care about those who serve their country.


http://news.yahoo.com/michelle-obama-dr-jill-biden-draw-boos-nascar-232438819.html

The article states that Michelle Obama and Jill Biden were introduced they received a smattering of boos.When the military veteran was introduced, he received resounding applause.



I watched the video. The soldier was introduced first and received applause. Then he, his family, Obama, and Biden were all presented to start the race. That when the boos started. Obviously, the boos were aimed at Obama and Biden. But, the presentation of the grand marshals -- the announcement that was booed, included the soldier and his family. Moreover, the purpose of the 1st and 2nd ladies at the event was not a love of auto racing, but to help support military families. It is impossible to argue that the boos were for a specific purpose separate from the context of what was happening. The bottom line is that an effort to bring attention to the need to support military families was booed. Also, based on what I could hear in the video, it was hardly a smattering of boos. It was quite loud and I couldn't hear any applause.


I respectfully disagree, the purpose was to move into red state territory and try to save Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia for Obama/Biden (male/male). So no, I do not at all agree with your bottom line, but you are welcome to your opinion. Perhaps the audience was still smarting from "You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
Anonymous
I respectfully disagree, the purpose was to move into red state territory and try to save Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia for Obama/Biden (male/male). So no, I do not at all agree with your bottom line, but you are welcome to your opinion. Perhaps the audience was still smarting from "You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."


Very astute.
Anonymous
The Empress MIchelle's husband and none of her family has served in the US miklitary.

Obama's uncle liberated Buchenwald. Or do you still think his entire family is from Kenya?
jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:

I respectfully disagree, the purpose was to move into red state territory and try to save Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia for Obama/Biden (male/male). So no, I do not at all agree with your bottom line, but you are welcome to your opinion. Perhaps the audience was still smarting from "You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."


They were in Florida. Nowhere near Pennsylvania or Ohio. Michelle Obama chose supporting military familes as her personal cause from the very beginning of the administration. She has been all over the country in support of that cause. Maybe you feel that is nothing more than a re-election ploy and, as you said to me, you are welcome to your opinion. When Laura Bush chose to focus on reading, she was not subject to similar charges. I assume she occasionally read to children in blue states. But, your response shows great solidarity with the those who booed the two women. You are so consumed by your dislike of them that you cannot get beyond it to see that they are doing something that you would otherwise support (unless you are also part of the anti-military right). There was very little about George W. Bush that I liked, but even I could acknowledge that he made a positive contribution to the fight against AIDS in Africa. It would never enter my mind to boo him at an event where he promoted that fight, let alone attempt to justify someone else's booing.
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

I respectfully disagree, the purpose was to move into red state territory and try to save Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia for Obama/Biden (male/male). So no, I do not at all agree with your bottom line, but you are welcome to your opinion. Perhaps the audience was still smarting from "You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."


They were in Florida. Nowhere near Pennsylvania or Ohio. Michelle Obama chose supporting military familes as her personal cause from the very beginning of the administration. She has been all over the country in support of that cause. Maybe you feel that is nothing more than a re-election ploy and, as you said to me, you are welcome to your opinion. When Laura Bush chose to focus on reading, she was not subject to similar charges. I assume she occasionally read to children in blue states. But, your response shows great solidarity with the those who booed the two women. You are so consumed by your dislike of them that you cannot get beyond it to see that they are doing something that you would otherwise support (unless you are also part of the anti-military right). There was very little about George W. Bush that I liked, but even I could acknowledge that he made a positive contribution to the fight against AIDS in Africa. It would never enter my mind to boo him at an event where he promoted that fight, let alone attempt to justify someone else's booing.


I realize this sounds hard to believe, but NASCAR broadcasts can be found in every radio market in PA, OH, WV, VA, NC etc. every Sunday they are running. Really, people not only listen to it, the live for it.

And I don't dislike either of the ladies, I just reject your logic that booing them constitutes disrespect for the military because the reason they were there was to show support for military. IMO that was not the reason they were there at all, any more than I believe that Tareq and Michaele Salahi crashed the White House dinner because they were hungry (although it was a dinner). They were there to show their blue collar creds to boost their spouses reelection efforts, period. NASCAR fans ARE the military - so I would conclude that the crowd's perception was much like mine, and that the booing was because they were White House surrogates and had zip, zero, nada to do with the military. But again, you are welcome to your opinion, I don't think it much bothers those NASCAR fans
takoma
Member Offline
Just a reminder: There are enough people on both sides who overstep that we should hesitate to tar the other side with their sins lest we be tarred with the sins of those on our side.

I know that each side feels the other side has by far the worst sinners, but a little charity would not hurt -- although I suppose it would take a lot of fun out of this lovely rant arena that Jeff is kind enough to provide for us.
jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:
I realize this sounds hard to believe, but NASCAR broadcasts can be found in every radio market in PA, OH, WV, VA, NC etc. every Sunday they are running. Really, people not only listen to it, the live for it.

And I don't dislike either of the ladies, I just reject your logic that booing them constitutes disrespect for the military because the reason they were there was to show support for military. IMO that was not the reason they were there at all, any more than I believe that Tareq and Michaele Salahi crashed the White House dinner because they were hungry (although it was a dinner). They were there to show their blue collar creds to boost their spouses reelection efforts, period. NASCAR fans ARE the military - so I would conclude that the crowd's perception was much like mine, and that the booing was because they were White House surrogates and had zip, zero, nada to do with the military. But again, you are welcome to your opinion, I don't think it much bothers those NASCAR fans


Again, Michelle Obama has been working in support of military families ever since she became First Lady. She didn't just decide to show up at a NASCAR race. The race was in Homestead, Florida, home of the Homestead Air Base. You can learn more about the Joining Forces Initiative that she leads here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/joiningforces

Do you contend that her entire effort has been nothing but a re-election effort? Do you similarly feel that Laura Bush's efforts to bring attention to reading was a re-election ploy?

If you watch the full video of the NASCAR incident (I noticed that it has been misleadingly cut in many cases), you will see that what led to the booing is this statement by the announcers:

"And now, please welcome our grand marshals, Sergeant Andrew Barry and his family, First Lady of the United States, Michelle Obama, and Dr. Jill Biden as they deliver the most famous words in motor sports".

This followed quite a bit of talk about the need to support military families. I don't understand how anyone can say the Sergeant wasn't also being booed.

To the extent the two women were "White House" surrogates, they were representing White House efforts to support military families. The crowd decided to boo that effort and you support their boos. How would you feel about liberals booing George W. Bush at a function in which he was attempting to bring attention to fighting AIDS in Africa? Would you accept their explanation that they didn't think Bush really cared about AIDS in Africa and was just trying to build political support? I don't think you would accept it anymore than I accept your explanation.

Some times the side with which you agree does things that are wrong. It's okay to admit it. I do it al the time. This is your chance to do it.
Anonymous
I think it's appalling to boo Michele O or Laura B. I would never dream of doing either. I hate Bush but I wouldn't boo him. Too disrespectful.
Anonymous
The real help would be to pay them considerably more so wives of enlisted military don't have to be surrogates in order to have enough money to live.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think it's appalling to boo Michele O or Laura B. I would never dream of doing either. I hate Bush but I wouldn't boo him. Too disrespectful.


Ditto. As much as I hated Bush, it would not have occured to me in a million years to boo his wife for anything, and least of all for trying to do accomplish something positive in a cerenomial role. Those NASCAR fans are creeps with no class. And to the PP who said that "guess what, those NASCAR fans are military too", being in the military doesn't absolve you of behaving with decency. If you bite the extended hand of someone who has been trying to support you, you are a jerk with no class, military or not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Empress MIchelle's husband and none of her family has served in the US miklitary.

Obama's uncle liberated Buchenwald. Or do you still think his entire family is from Kenya?

As a side note. Africans fought during world war 2. This has just been sidelined by historians. But the last count I heard was from BBC that it is estimated that about 1 million Africans fought in that war.

And my take on this issue is. Why do politicians come to sporting events, if it is not to do political campaigning.
So I agree with them. Sport should be kept separate from politics. Let the politicians do their campaigns on their own time, not take advantage of a politics free event
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: