Good point about technology. I think the fast pace it brings makes things harder for our kids, but I also suspect the emissions from technology could be one of the environmental factors that pulls the trigger of the gun loaded by genetics. (Sorry to talk about guns..just a common saying with autism...genetics load the gun and environment pulls the trigger. |
And you need to read more carefully too. She said there were zero non-verbal kids in her school. Of course there were. They weren't allowed in. No one disputes there are more cases of allergies, ADHD, etc. now. That's not the point. I was taking issue with her notion that there were no "non-verbal" kids in the 70's. Wishful thinking. Out of sight, out of mind. |
|
Nonverbal kids were institutionalized. They no longer are. There were no nonverbal kids in any of our schools -- they didn't go to school. That is what changed. Its ridiculous for you to say because you didn't see them, they didn't exist. I personally know of several adults who have been nonverbal autistic their entire lives. They do not live at home.
You can say there are no genetic epidemics but its pretty meaningless. ASDs have a large genetic component. Call it an epidemic if you'd like, or not. Its always been with us. |
|
Nonverbal kids were institutionalized. They no longer are. There were no nonverbal kids in any of our schools -- they didn't go to school. That is what changed. Its ridiculous for you to say because you didn't see them, they didn't exist. I personally know of several adults who have been nonverbal autistic their entire lives. They do not live at home.
You can say there are no genetic epidemics but its pretty meaningless. ASDs have a large genetic component. Call it an epidemic if you'd like, or not. Its always been with us. |
|
Nonverbal kids were institutionalized. They no longer are. There were no nonverbal kids in any of our schools -- they didn't go to school. That is what changed. Its ridiculous for you to say because you didn't see them, they didn't exist. I personally know of several adults who have been nonverbal autistic their entire lives. They do not live at home.
You can say there are no genetic epidemics but its pretty meaningless. ASDs have a large genetic component. Call it an epidemic if you'd like, or not. Its always been with us. |
It doesn't matter how many times you say the same thing....it doesn't make it true!! |
It doesn't matter how many times you deny the truth. You are still wrong. |
| There has to be some genetic predisposition, but 1 in 100, is that what it is now? Those numbers didn't exist 30 years ago. This is an epidemic. It's man-made. This planet is being ruined and our children are suffering. |
Yes, they did exist 30 years ago. If you look at the community study in Britain, they found the same percentage of adults with ASD in the general population as the percentage of children that existed. 30 years ago, you couldn't diagnose autism, asperger's, PDD-NOS, Rett's or Childhood Disintegrative Disorder. In 1980, the DSM-III included infantile autism which was a pretty narrow category for the most severely effected children. Prior to that date, it was a diagnostic category AT ALL. In 1994, the DSM-IV included asperger's, PDD-NOS, Rett's or Childhood Disintegrative Disorder and changed the criteria for autism to cover more kids. It's not that ASD didn't exist before 1980 or 1994, it's that it was diagnosed. Another study reviewed records for institutionalized adults who were not diagnosed with autism. They found that these adults could currently be diagnosed with ASD and their childhood psych records show that they could have been dx'd as children if the dx category had existed and been widely understood. There is good evidence that there is no epidemic, just broader diagnostic categories and a better understanding of which kids to dx. |
|
|
Yes, autism existed in the 80's....but the rates were like 1 in 10,000. Currently, chances are 1 in 58 boys will be diagnosed with an ASD label. Not all of these will be non-verbal, but the ones that ARE will far ourweight the 1 in 10,000 from the 80's and 90's.
And you can't tell me that people with non-verbal children did not take their kid to the doctor to get a diagnosis. There are some obvious cases of autism out there. And it's prevelance has grown. I see "obvious" all over the place now. I live in a neighborhood with less than 40 houses. There are no less than 3 diagnosed kids within those 38 families. That puts the stats more in the range of 1 in 4 families affected. This isn't because of misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis now vs underdiagnosis then, it is so freaking obvious that these kids are affliced that it cannot be denied. Autism is an epidemic right now. I don't see how anyone can be blind to this. |
|
Not every child with ASD is nonverbal. With intensive therapy, a lot can change. My kid was nonverbal up to age 3. Now she speaks read and comprehends very well. It took a looootttt of therapy but I wouldn't o it any different.
|
I don't think I would ever have categorized your child as non-verbal then, because there are many "late talkers" who are non-verbal until 5 or 6. I'm more referring to the OBVIOUS cases of severe autism, and the ones who never learn to speak. My son didn't speak until after 3, but I don't refer to him as ever being non-verbal. |
| And not every nonverbal child is "on the spectrum." |
I'm not blind. It's just not true. You have your facts wrong. Your anecdotal experience does not make it an epidemic. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/making-sense-autistic-spectrum-disorders/201006/007-no-autism-epidemic-part-1 http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/making-sense-autistic-spectrum-disorders/201007/008-no-autism-epidemic-part-2 http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/making-sense-autistic-spectrum-disorders/201007/009-no-autism-epidemic-part-3 http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/making-sense-autistic-spectrum-disorders/201007/010-no-autism-epidemic-part-3-more-data |