Great point. Agreed. |
+1. This is not good for the school and especially the kids. Speaks to the decline of rigor and hard work. Things are way too easy and it hurts kids from working hard to reach their fullest potential. It’s bad enough they can retake tests, not get 0, etc….and now everyone doesn’t need to do much to even get an A. Just when you think there is still 1 high school with high standards, you have DCPS trying to destroy it. Just get out of DCPS and their sh*tshow as soon as you can. |
|
|
This is a DCPS issue. Students can turn in work whenever they want and often, they have an opportunity to retake/resubmit assignments they do poorly on.
No accountability and no real way for parents to see how their kids are actually doing. I’ve been teaching in DCPS for many years. Never have so many of my students had such high grades. That would be fine if it correlated to their efforts and ability, but it doesn’t. |
|
I thought the same about Deal when so many posted about their kids having 4.0s to even apply to Walls. I suspect its a national issue as teachers know how impactful grades are to college admissions.
A 3.5 used to be a really good GPA and now it's treated like a C average. |
+1. DD applied from a private school with a similar philosophy where nobody gets a 4.0 and I felt bad for her this year when applying for 9th grade. I knew she had no shot at SWW due to her 7th grade year. She switched schools for 8th grade and received a 4.0 for the first time for probably half the effort. |
I agree. This a national issue driven by colleges. No one is getting an “A” in DCPS based on 50s and 63s alone. Those policies raise graduation rates; they don’t give anyone a weighted GPA over 4.0. Before you try to get DCPS to unilaterally disarm, take a good look at what happened in college admissions this year to unhooked smart kids from private schools that tried unilateral disarmament. |
BUT...won't this bite colleges in the butt? If the applicant pool is watered down with kids who aren't used to working hard, it doesn't seem like this is in the schools' best interest. I know people complain about millennials not liking to work hard, seems this next generation will be even worse. |
It does not appear that colleges are particularly concerned about this. |
Getting into a top college is not the primary goal. The goal is to prepare your kid to be able to handle the work and rigor of college. Reality is top colleges don’t care, because there will always be alot if kids coming from better schools with the rigor and academic challenge. The issue is yourkid from walls will struggle against these kids and it will be sink or swim |
You assume a kid from Walls will struggle because they got all As at Walls? Is there a higher grade they could have gotten? |
Don't be naive. WS is not a grade any teacher wants to give, It has been mandated by DCPS and administrators. It's a gift to kids who perpetually don't turn in work on time, but an F would cause trouble, so you give them a WS and time to get it in. Canvas has a time stamp. Turning it in does not mean it was turned in on time. It's the default "please don't fail this student" meant to appease parents and keep graduation rates higher. If teachers ever really gave your kids the grades they actually deserve, held them accountable for deadlines, you people would be up in arms and threatening to sue. There is absolutely grade inflation at every high school across the country, and that's why so many parents are left complaining that their "high stats" kids dd not get into colleges they wanted. That's because damn near everybody has high stats now. You need the other stuff. High GPA is nearly irrelevant at this point in admissions. |
It doesn’t matter if your kid can’t get into the college in the first place because he has a 3.4. If you want to cultivate or demonstrate discipline, persistence, and effort, play a sport. Teachers can provide rigor and challenge, while avoiding the wrath of parents, by maintaining high standards on paper and curving up for the grade book. Many teachers do this already. True, if both scores curve to an A the colleges can’t see the difference between the kid who got a 41 and the kid who got a 35, but as you say, the grade itself is not the primary goal. |
Not yet. Once these colleges see the outcomes, things will change and they’ll revert back to “the sure thing.” |
MIT already did, right? |