Will do. Don't need a sophomoric joke told by my 14 year old son to wreck his HS experience. I will teach him right/wrong and I will find teachers who want to educate. |
I’m sure the have very similar views |
Remarkable how quickly so many posters condemn the author without knowing him, condemn the article because of where it was published, but are blind to the obvious fact that the story is really part of a larger dynamic -- the often unchecked influence of increasingly aggressive DEI officers and increasingly vague DEI policies with minimal oversight.
Of course, everyone would agree as to what is really "racist" right? Of course, everyone knows "hate speech" when they see it, right? Tell that to this Native American student at Yale Law School - also published by the Free Beacon (this time with tape recordings to prove the facts in the story.) https://freebeacon.com/campus/a-yale-law-student-sent-a-lighthearted-email-inviting-classmates-to-his-trap-house-the-school-is-now-calling-him-to-account/ |
There there, little buddy. Sorry middle and high school aged kids can't make racist jokes at school anymore and get away with it. I know it must be confusing and frightening when the world changes from being ordered to the whims and conveniences of your own demographic group, and gosh darn it, you liked it the old way! But it'll be OK, snowflake. |
If your 14 year old thinks a racist joke (which you dismiss as "sophomoric") is acceptable in any context, let alone school, by that age, you've failed as a parent -- unless of course your goal was to raise a racist, in which case, bravo! |
So here is the sad and shocking truth for you totalitarian DEI loving liberals, your kids are the ones making the racist comments not my independent no party affiliation ones. Mine have not only been raised to abhor racism but unfortunately and more acutely have a a genuine fear of the thought police and cancel culture. Your liberal children have the mantle of liberal hubris--they think that because they are so accepting they can say whatever they want, and they do, I've been shocked by what comes out of these kids mouth whose parents publicly espouse absolute" tolerance" at all costs. As far as the STA policy, it is dangerous and it won't and can't be applied evenly. I have no doubt that if the two kids say the same racist thing and one is the son of a Republican law maker and the other the son of Democratic one, or better yet a liberal media talent (STA really loves those these days) the outcome will not be the same. And what about the race of the racist perp? I've heard black kids say racist things to white, Asian, gay, and Hispanic kids--will they be treated the same? I doubt it. |
|
STA had made some major mistakes in its admissions and is now suffering the consequences for years to come…. |
Talk about undermining your message of neutrality with a bunch of far-right talking points . . . |
Only far right in your dc liberal bubble. Might want to get out of your comfort zone a bit and open your eyes to your leftist extremists prejudices. |
Holy shit take a Xanax or Valium and go meditate! You could use a little yogi style meditation and green tea! You sound completely unhinged! Tell your son and spouse to keep their racist and anti Semitic jokes to themselves and you will be okay! |
I've lived all over this country, including in the Midwest, and identify as an independent (pro-military, pro-civil rights). You might think I live in some bubble, but clearly you are deep within the far-right echo chamber. Have fun with that. |
DP. Now we see what STA is dealing with and why they would have to pass such a measure. Sorry guys no more racist or anti-Semitic jokes are allowed. Yes. What is your point? Regardless of politics who wants their kids or classmates spewing jokes that are hurtful to anyone? Aren’t we all trying to teach our kids to be better humans and people? |
I would think that BOTH the impact ad the intent would be of utmost importance in understanding, adjudicating, and remediating cases of hate speech... but they clearly juxtapose these and explicitly diminish the relative importance of intent. It's a question of degree... but the way it's worded in the draft policy it clearly comes across that while intent might technically still be a consideration, it's a relatively unimportant one. I think that's wrong. |
Ok folks, let’s test the policy.
16 year old invites his class to a birthday party at his house, and the invite says “I’m 16! Come to my Trap House and celebrate.” Racist? Hate Speech? Yes, no, maybe? Do you need to Google it? Does it depend on whether he illegally served underaged kids beer? What if he plays rap music at the party? What if half the students of a particular racial group say it is and they fee threatened. And what if the other half say it isn’t racist at all? What if its tour son’s best friend hosting the party and you and he gets the invite first. If you don’t report it and it is later deemed racist, has you done committed an honor code violation? Have you? The draft policy says students and parents are expected to report. |