It that the bill that allows abortion until birth? |
Yelling and name calling isn't going to get you anywhere. |
How about your eye rolling emojis? Girl, bye. |
From NYT today: “I would be wary of jumping to a conclusion that the leaker is necessarily someone who opposes overturning Roe v. Wade,” said Richard L. Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine. Kermit Roosevelt, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania, said the source was probably trying to increase the price of switching positions. “In terms of who leaked it and why, it seems much more likely to me that it comes from the right in response to an actual or threatened defection by one of the five who voted to overturn Roe,” he said. “Leaking this early draft makes that more costly for a defector because now people will think that they changed their vote after the leak in response to public outrage.” Professor Hasen said there was another benefit to the right from the disclosure of the draft opinion. “This kind of leak could in fact help the likely future majority overturning Roe if it deflects the conversation to the question of Supreme Court secrecy and the danger of leaks to the legitimacy of the process,” he said. “That’s better than a conversation about the potential illegitimacy of overturning longstanding precedent allowing reproductive choice. It also could be intended to soften the blow by signaling to everyone the earthquake to come.” https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/03/us/politics/supreme-court-leak-roe-v-wade-abortion.html?name=styln-abortion-us®ion=TOP_BANNER&block=storyline_menu_recirc&action=click&pgtype=LegacyCollection&variant=show&is_new=false |
It is in the Constitution, though. “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” |
Wow, you have some big feelings about this. |
Take your energy elsewhere. I am not a liar. You are the simpleton- reducing this outcome to a few people and not laying it at the feet of people who acted in FAVOR of it. |
Roe was “legislating through the courts.” Overturning Roe is…not. It returns the issue to state legislatures. |
If it hadn’t leaked it would have done all those same things, closer to the midterms. |
Yup. This release is like a numbing agent. Weeks of small scale protests in front of the courts with F You Alito signs will give way to Jackson taking Breyer’s seat and business as uzh. We wont talk much more about Ginni, Clarence, and recusal. We’ll flop over on demand, as we always do. Please tell me where I’m wrong, because I don’t want to be right. |
But why are only women being discussed? What about the men who have been chipping away at women’s rights? They hold greater power in our society. |
Check who was President when Marshall died, chief. |
Yasss queen, sassy comments about McConnells neck folds and capacity for evil will change things within D control. Perhaps you suggest a women’s wine luncheon to discuss how much we rilly rilly hate Sen. Collins. Action! |
Hi Chief! See, Marshall begat Thomas because Marshall thought he was going to die, and he - not being Nostradamus - didn’t think a serially unfaithful Arkansan who fetishized JFK would win election. |
| But her emails am I right????? |