Anonymous wrote:what reality check are you talking about? Because the reality check still really goes back to the income and age multipliers, not really the "i have more than you do" thing.
Some of these numbers seem damn near impossible without a)a MUCH higher income at some point or b)some windfall that built up your account.
Almost every article I've read is to try to aim for 15% of your income into retirement accounts yearly and at least 1X HHI by 35 (this has been downgraded a little since the crash). THOSE are the goals people should be aiming for.
THOSE goals are not necessarily any more useful. Those calculators and articles generally assume you spend a certain amount of your HHI and intend to maintain your standard of living in retirement. If, like many of the financial savvy people on DCUM, you save a large percentage of your income, are still paying off hefty student loan debts that will be paid off before you retire, or you plan to move to a cheaper area of the country, it is not as useful to look percentage of income.
My DH and I (both 31) currently live on his $120k salary, and use my $150k salary for savings and student loan repayment. We're intending to leave DC and head back to the midwest within the next 5 years, where we will likely have lower salaries, but much lower cost of living. Using 15% of our current combined incomes to calculate where our retirement should be at doesn't really make sense for us. We've worked with a financial advisor to think about what our actual costs will be in retirement, added a hefty cushion, and worked backward to think about what we should be saving in our retirement funds. It's a more difficult process, but gave us much more useful numbers.
In terms of total amounts: HHI of $270k, my 401k is about $100k, and his has about $45k. We have about $4k in college savings for our just-turned-2 DD. We also have a substantial amount of money saved and invested.
|