That is a fair point. I was just mentioning the actual odds because I think many people would assume family history for schizophrenia (among non-parent family members) provides a much larger risk increase than it actually does. |
| I can't believe this is a topic that has been allowed to go on this long. This is probably the most discriminatory post I've seen here. People have kids without being able to afford them and they die from sickness. Dying themselves days after conception. Addicted. In jail. Corrupting youth. Sexually abusing them. There are very few people with major illnesses that have children anyway. This is so not an issue compared to all the other worthless parents out there. They are dealing with so many things that others have no concept of. |
You are being judgemental to people who are having a meaningful discussion about family planning decisions. The interesting thing is that it is generally the people who don’t have personal experience with family history of a severe disease that are more supportive of genetic considerations for family planning decisions. The people with a family history of schizophrenia, or Huntington’s disease, sickle cell disease are largely very supportive of genetic screening to prevent their kids from suffering from these diseases. Even the people who have these diseases are largely unbothered by the moralistic hysteria about “discrimination”. They just want their kids to be healthy and not struggle with the diseases that they have themselves. |
Lots of people think those folks shouldn’t have children either. The question isn’t whether the government should forcibly sterilize people with serious mental illnesses. The question is whether people with serious mental illnesses should choose to have and raise children. |
No. |