No not issues to prevent travel but issues start to appear in your 50s, so I'd prefer to have all the "dream travel" done by 70, so 55-70 is when we are doing it. If we are still good at 70, great we will travel. If not, we will travel to our kids/grandkids and not regret our choices, because we retired at 55 and not at 65/67. Also, you never know when those issues will hinder travel. We are extremely healthy, yet in mid 50s, things have started cropping up. So I wouldn't want to wait until 70 to start our adventures of traveling |
Well if you still have kids at home at that age, that was your choice. We are 55 and last kid is senior in college (undergrad and grad school fully funded). So we are retired. So for now, it's mostly us traveling---strange that we as a couple like to spend time together, right? Many friends can "work from anywhere" so we also travel with some of our friends for parts of the trips---they work 5-6 hours and by 3pm we have rest of day together to do things with them. But I don't need to travel with a group---we like spending time togehter and when possible the kids join for 1-2 trips a year. |
Well the issue is that if you have $7 F'ing million at age 52, you likely are living a lifestyle that cannot continue to be supported by retiring at 52 and living until 85+. So yes, you "could" retire, many of us want to travel (and not budget travel), live in a nice house/condo, and continue living a similar lifestyle to while we were working (maybe downsize but still nice home). And that in our VHCOLA is not very feasible on $7M, if I have to pay for 13+ years of healthcare and live the way I want. Healthcare for us at 55 is $3.2K/month with a $7K/$14K deductible right now (and that's ONLY medical). So I'd estimate we will spend $4.5K/month on medical/dental/vision easily, more if either of us has an issue (spouse needed a few MRIs last year due to a new issue---well you have to pay the deductible first, and ongoing PT) So most of us would rather work a bit longer to have the life we want, especially if you enjoy your job. |
This may be difficult for some to believe, but one way to get to $7M by 50ish is to NOT spend lots of money aged 20-50, and instead save and invest your earnings. Folks who live like this do not have an inflated standard of living, and retire more than comfortably at 50 or so. The key is to value your time and life more than endless possessions and to appreciate that bigger is not usually better. - retired and living in peace and happiness |
Preach! |
| To the OP: while the consensus that you’re not ready to retire tomorrow is sound, please don’t let this board convince you that you need to wait 5 years! My advice would be to start tracking your expenses more closely for a year (I use Simplifi as an easy option with a good app) while continuing to save what’s comfortable on your great earnings. With a year of data, you may well find that you can retire or significantly scale back earnings in 1-2 years. Personally, my goal is 55 and ~$4m in today’s dollars plus a paid off house. But I know that works for us because I know what we spend to feel comfortable. |
Did you miss the part where she’s still paying for private HS and hasn’t paid for college yet? |
We lived like that up until about 45. Then college was fully funded, we had a company sale, and we finally started "spending more". So we had $10M+ at that age. But we still retired at 56 and are set. Spouse loved their job, so didn't want to retire until 56/57 (always had been the goal) (and sticking around for another 10 years did mean adding significantly to our bottom line (now approaching UHNW). But point remains that many with that much are not saving as much (I know I see it with friends/co-workers). |
+1 Yup! the OP "Could retire now" but not with the private HS and college not fully funded yet. Oh, and still owes over $600K on their house. Most planning to retire early have education taken care of (saved for) and own their home (or have the money set aside to pay it off and it's not part of their "retirement dollar amount"). |
It's not how PP was phrased It was literally anxiety driven BS. If you want to live on a lap of luxury and love your jobs then you are obviously not going to relate to OP or anyone else who is asking this question "can we afford to retire now" in the first place.
|
Or.. you could just be a very high earning family or have some windfall that came your way. I am on the same page with you as far as doubting the assumption that someone with a NW of 7 mil must be a huge spender living on a lap of luxury. But the point I was trying to make that the entire objective reality of someone needing many millions to retire doesn't exist. If it existed then we would not have millions of broke seniors living off SS in their old homes and not yet having masses of old people begging on the streets. Seniors with money they can't spend and who are constantly traveling in luxury and dining out and buying homes for their kids are still minority of population. Tiny minority. Even if they may be in your face in this HCOL area. There is no objective reality where a couple needs 10 mil to retire and 7 mil is just not enough. |
This is the ideal scenario which doesn't always work in reality. In real life people in their 50s are not always growing their NW even if they keep working. Some even lose their livelihood or at least have it vastly reduced by having to take on less enjoyable, more junior and less paying jobs. Investments don't always go up in real world because people invest into different things that don't always go up and some people take risks that don't pan out and they lose a lot. It's possible and not infrequent that such families have to rethink the path for their kids when their college savings fall short and they find themselves in a situation unable to keep the stream of income they counted on (or maybe sometimes unwilling due to various reasons like failed marriage/divorce/health issues, etc). People also sometimes downsize housing for economic reasons even if their kids aren't done with school yet or fully launched or whatever. Expecting this won't happen and NOT planning for exit plan with LESS is also not a very smart way to live. |
But the OP is "living it up" Paying $90K/year for HS? and college is not fully saved for, and house is not paid off. They are not living like someone who wants to "retire early". Most who plan to do that have it all saved for education and house paid off....and they would be using public schools for K-12, not expensive private schools. had they done that, they likely could easily retire right now. |
Maybe they are willing to sacrifice private schools or downsize their home earlier to pay for schools or whatever. Who knows. The point is that "I love my job and can keep doing it till the day I die or at least till 65" doesn't apply to them. They wouldn't be asking had they been enjoying their work lives. |