who else is really just sick of AI being everywhere now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes am sick of it, esp generative AI. I don’t want their stupid summaries or lists or bad style writing.

Am also not crazy about agentic AI, I try to get what I need for about two mins and then zero out or hang up.

Am not impressed.

Kids really don’t know the garbage they are reading is garbage.

I do like AI at work for cleaning up data and saving me time and steps.

Thanks for being part of the problem. Sorry to hear you’re too incompetent or lazy to do your job, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes am sick of it, esp generative AI. I don’t want their stupid summaries or lists or bad style writing.

Am also not crazy about agentic AI, I try to get what I need for about two mins and then zero out or hang up.

Am not impressed.

Kids really don’t know the garbage they are reading is garbage.

I do like AI at work for cleaning up data and saving me time and steps.

The biggest danger is that vulnerable people,especially socially awkward males will start favoring it over human relationships. It will tell them whatever they want to hear. Comply with pornographic requests. In short, pose no challenges to their whims or ideas.

Akshually, it's shown that more females are using A.I. for relationship purposes and therapy than males.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has mentioned AI being awful at art. And to think people are calling themselves AI “artists” makes me so confused. For one, you do not even make the art, a robot does it for you, and secondly, AI can still make tons of mistakes and look terrible even on a sheet of paper.

Music too. For 10+ years I have been finding new artists on YouTube and that's pretty much dead now. I'll put something on and the next song that pops up will be an hour of slop called "Autumn Cafe" with no artists named.

The hour plus slop music and ai sleep music vids are the most profitable videos relative to effort on youtube. I have done LOTS of research on youtube and tried to get into this field. Example, a channel that does 2 to 3 hour videos about 5-10 times a month with average 50k views each video will earn between 8-15K a month. Can quit working if have 1 or 2 of those channels. Those videos take about 30-60 minutes to make. So the channel owners that have this setup are chilling in life. In a year or so 50 percent of youtube will be AI vids. The reason is because they are so easy to make compared to non AI vids. Sure, the legacy non-AI channels that already have 100k plus subs will survive, but AI vids will crowd the algorithm and eventually crush new non-AI content (as AI improves and no one will be able to distinguish if AI).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has mentioned AI being awful at art. And to think people are calling themselves AI “artists” makes me so confused. For one, you do not even make the art, a robot does it for you, and secondly, AI can still make tons of mistakes and look terrible even on a sheet of paper.

Music too. For 10+ years I have been finding new artists on YouTube and that's pretty much dead now. I'll put something on and the next song that pops up will be an hour of slop called "Autumn Cafe" with no artists named.

The hour plus slop music and ai sleep music vids are the most profitable videos relative to effort on youtube. I have done LOTS of research on youtube and tried to get into this field. Example, a channel that does 2 to 3 hour videos about 5-10 times a month with average 50k views each video will earn between 8-15K a month. Can quit working if have 1 or 2 of those channels. Those videos take about 30-60 minutes to make. So the channel owners that have this setup are chilling in life. In a year or so 50 percent of youtube will be AI vids. The reason is because they are so easy to make compared to non AI vids. Sure, the legacy non-AI channels that already have 100k plus subs will survive, but AI vids will crowd the algorithm and eventually crush new non-AI content (as AI improves and no one will be able to distinguish if AI).

Wow, interesting.
And grim AF.

[Anonymous]

I hate AI... except for this (Real Housewives of the White House) https://www.instagram.com/rhotwh/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I keep opening up apps, alot of them I’ve used for past a decade now and seeing almost all of them have something AI related features on their app really bothers me, even seeing over 15 AI ads on YouTube is so bothering some. I really don’t get why companies are now going to be enduring the AI hellhole, and there is already too much…

Honestly, this reaction is pretty normal whenever a foundational technology hits escape velocity.

AI isn’t “everywhere” because companies woke up one morning and decided to annoy you. It’s everywhere because once a tool becomes dramatically more capable than what came before, the gravitational pull to integrate it becomes massive. Same thing happened with electricity, the internet, smartphones — people complained then too. (“Why do I need the internet on my phone?!”)

But here’s the thing: we’re still in the early beta phase of the AI age. Most apps are slapping on AI like a bumper sticker — not very thoughtful. That will go away. The market forces + user behavior will eliminate low-value noise. Bad features die. Good features survive. Same rules as evolution.

AI isn’t supposed to be intrusive. It’s supposed to be a multiplier. If it’s not improving your life, that’s on the designers, not the technology.

Also… ads on YouTube? Yeah, that part is just annoying. Even I skip them.

But long-term? You’re going to see AI do things that feel almost magical: cure diseases, design better cities, accelerate discovery, give people superpowers they didn’t have before. We’re talking about improving the future of civilization, not just giving your apps another button to tap.

If we do this right, AI isn’t a “hellhole.”
It’s the gateway to making a much better world — and possibly a multiplanetary one.

Just need smarter implementation, less hype, and way fewer pop-up ads.

+1000 to all of this

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hate AI... except for this (Real Housewives of the White House) https://www.instagram.com/rhotwh/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes am sick of it, esp generative AI. I don’t want their stupid summaries or lists or bad style writing.

Am also not crazy about agentic AI, I try to get what I need for about two mins and then zero out or hang up.

Am not impressed.

Kids really don’t know the garbage they are reading is garbage.

I do like AI at work for cleaning up data and saving me time and steps.

+1

[Anonymous]

It's become more intrusive. I detest the AI news summaries that show up when I check news feeds on my Android. But worse are the AI offers to help when I'm using many kinds of software. It's like having an in-law at my elbow poking into my business.

When I use AI I do so intentionally (aside of course from all the stuff it's doing in the background of stuff and I don't know it). I don't like being prodded into using it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
The biggest danger is that vulnerable people,especially socially awkward males will start favoring it over human relationships. It will tell them whatever they want to hear. Comply with pornographic requests. In short, pose no challenges to their whims or ideas.

Sounds like a you problem.

[Anonymous]

The A.I. genie is out of the bottle, Pandora’s box opened. It is here to stay.

Certainly, there are good things about it but it should not be used for creative works such as art or music.

I have noticed AI music has no “soul”, the same with “literature” written by AI: the human quirks, slightly off pitch vocals, and other subtle mannerisms are missing. The music is technically correct, the grammar also correct but it is missing the humanity. I do not like it.

YouTube videos are being made by AI and I do not like them. They are monotonous with no character. No humanity. Some AI videos are acceptable such as replacing an appliance part but even then I would prefer a human demonstrating.