Harvard tell Trump to pound sand

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

Agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

Agree.

+1 but the current school leaders obviously don't care, so give the money elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Harvard stopped its racial discrimination?

WTF are you going on about? This is about the RWNJs dictating what will be taught, who will teach it, what can not be taught and who can attend Harvard. This is Mao Tse-tung thought police and you are Trumps Red Guard.

It's all related.

The discrimination is part of the reason why you don't see society generally rising up to stand next to these academic institutions.

A lot of this (including Trump's election) is partly a reaction to the racial discrimination that has become acceptable to the fat left wing of the Democratic party.

To be fair, this already occurs, it just isn't the federal government actively doing it. But we have gatekeepers. One generally conveys a perception of freedom of choice, the other, not so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

Agree.

If Americans don't soon learn that it's okay to piss off "wealthy" donors, America as we know it will be completely destroyed by the greed behind the GOP and Democratic political parties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

As a Harvard alum, I have no problem pissing off zionist donors. If Harvard is beholden to their motto, they should keep keepin' on. Because the truth is that zionism is an abhorrent ideology that deserves to be routinely called out for what it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Harvard stopped its racial discrimination?

WTF are you going on about? This is about the RWNJs dictating what will be taught, who will teach it, what can not be taught and who can attend Harvard. This is Mao Tse-tung thought police and you are Trumps Red Guard.

Wow. So, this is how democracy does in darkness. Criticism of only one party is allowed. Proof that goose steppers also vote blue and wear blue.

Most people that typically support Democrats will admit that nominating Biden in 2020 was a mistake because his unfitness wound up making it possible for an even bigger mistake to win a second POTUS term in 2024. Being honest with yourself by admitting mistakes is a sign of intelligence that leads to not repeating mistakes. Very few people who mistakenly supported Trump have admitted to their mistake and most of them have repeated that mistake.

What does all this mean? The average Dem is a few notches up the IQ ladder from the average Republican.

Agree that admitting mistakes is a sign of intelligence. Comparing one party to another is ridiculous. Side A being slightly less ((bad characteristic)) than side B on an issue doesn’t mean that side Ą is good. What the PP upthread failed to understand is that some do-good policies at Harvard lead to discriminatory behaviors. They cannot see that because they see that is somehow exempts them from criticism and feel the need to shut down such comments. THAT is also totalitarian behavior. Free speech is only free if it supports the correct side (or the side in office).

Please tell us which "side" is "correct". All we've had to witness in recent years is a bunch of pathetic losers losing to another group of pathetic losers.

NP - 100% agree that the Dem party messed up and in numerous ways even pre-dating 2016. However, I think that doesn't relate to the topic here which should be focused on the disaster we face by defunding the creation of knowledge. Perhaps there is a case to be made to move knowledge building outside of universities (although a hard case IMO since that is where we have the pool of research talent) but the way that the US makes innovative breakthrough is through university research. And just like Trump's harebrained tariff plan to bring manufacturing back to the US BEFORE we have manufacturing capability in the US, putting a halt to current scientific discover BEFORE we have another system in place to continue the research is just not a smart move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has Harvard stopped its racial discrimination?

WTF are you going on about? This is about the RWNJs dictating what will be taught, who will teach it, what can not be taught and who can attend Harvard. This is Mao Tse-tung thought police and you are Trumps Red Guard.

Wow. So, this is how democracy does in darkness. Criticism of only one party is allowed. Proof that goose steppers also vote blue and wear blue.

Most people that typically support Democrats will admit that nominating Biden in 2020 was a mistake because his unfitness wound up making it possible for an even bigger mistake to win a second POTUS term in 2024. Being honest with yourself by admitting mistakes is a sign of intelligence that leads to not repeating mistakes. Very few people who mistakenly supported Trump have admitted to their mistake and most of them have repeated that mistake.

What does all this mean? The average Dem is a few notches up the IQ ladder from the average Republican.

Agree that admitting mistakes is a sign of intelligence. Comparing one party to another is ridiculous. Side A being slightly less ((bad characteristic)) than side B on an issue doesn’t mean that side Ą is good. What the PP upthread failed to understand is that some do-good policies at Harvard lead to discriminatory behaviors. They cannot see that because they see that is somehow exempts them from criticism and feel the need to shut down such comments. THAT is also totalitarian behavior. Free speech is only free if it supports the correct side (or the side in office).

Please tell us which "side" is "correct". All we've had to witness in recent years is a bunch of pathetic losers losing to another group of pathetic losers.

NP - 100% agree that the Dem party messed up and in numerous ways even pre-dating 2016. However, I think that doesn't relate to the topic here which should be focused on the disaster we face by defunding the creation of knowledge. Perhaps there is a case to be made to move knowledge building outside of universities (although a hard case IMO since that is where we have the pool of research talent) but the way that the US makes innovative breakthrough is through university research. And just like Trump's harebrained tariff plan to bring manufacturing back to the US BEFORE we have manufacturing capability in the US, putting a halt to current scientific discover BEFORE we have another system in place to continue the research is just not a smart move.

I agree with you. The Dem mistakes and failures during the Trump era have been far less of a direct harm to the American people than the greatest American mistake of all which is being duped into supporting Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

As a Harvard alum, I have no problem pissing off zionist donors. If Harvard is beholden to their motto, they should keep keepin' on. Because the truth is that zionism is an abhorrent ideology that deserves to be routinely called out for what it is.

We get the kind of person you are and no surprise that you're a Harvard alum. Let our tax dollars go elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anyone with enough money to impact Harvard’s bottom line and who is also giving that money to Harvard is smart enough to know their stand is a good thing. Plus they’ll likely attract new donors in the process.

99% of smart people are anti Trump. It’s the dummies we need to convince

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

Why should Harvard crack down on “pro-Palestine” speech? Or any speech, for that matter?

[Anonymous]

Bottom line:
Harvard simply doesn’t need to take cash from average hard working Americans.

[Anonymous]

Think of it this way MAGA. Your kids still have a chance to be DEI admits to Harvard. Given they're yours, merit based admission for them is a non-starter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

As a Harvard alum, I have no problem pissing off zionist donors. If Harvard is beholden to their motto, they should keep keepin' on. Because the truth is that zionism is an abhorrent ideology that deserves to be routinely called out for what it is.

We get the kind of person you are and no surprise that you're a Harvard alum. Let our tax dollars go elsewhere.

Oh? What kind of person am I? Do tell. I'm so curious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

Why should Harvard crack down on “pro-Palestine” speech? Or any speech, for that matter?

Is pro KKK speech acceptable to you? Is pro white speech acceptable to you? Is speech ranting against African Americans acceptable to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is unwise for Harvard. They are going to piss off all their wealthy Zionist donors if they refuse to crack down on pro-palestine speech.

Why should Harvard crack down on “pro-Palestine” speech? Or any speech, for that matter?

Is pro KKK speech acceptable to you? Is pro white speech acceptable to you? Is speech ranting against African Americans acceptable to you?

You are equating “pro-Palestine” speech with KKK speech? Wow, that’s insane.