Why do non believers like to hang around here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

So you are the same person who called PP a troll?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?

Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?

Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.

Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?

Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.

Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?

I see no "should". It was a very basic question. If you are afraid to actually answer, that speaks volumes about your ability to make a reasonable argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?

Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.

Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?

I see no "should". It was a very basic question. If you are afraid to actually answer, that speaks volumes about your ability to make a reasonable argument.

I see no "should" either. I also see no "basic" or "volumes". Those are your opinions, which are as allowable as pp's question

[Anonymous]

They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.

The invisible one, who lives in the sky. It seems more likely that more people will stop believing in such being.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.

But there is no evidence any of that is true. Some of us care what is true and wish to live our lives that way.

If we are shown evidence it is true, we will change our beliefs instantly. Can you say the same?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?

Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.

Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?

I see no "should". It was a very basic question. If you are afraid to actually answer, that speaks volumes about your ability to make a reasonable argument.

Don't make it more than it is. It is a simple compare and contrast type question that we all learned in 3rd grade English.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Because religion is an endlessly fascinating topic that delves into the psyches of people. And outside of the spiritual aspects, I am interested in the actual life of Jesus.

Are you interested in the actual life of Santa Claus too? What about Siddhartha Gautama or Zoroaster?

What a twisted logic.
Full time dwelling troll.

DP - please explain the differences between the PP's examples and Jesus.

I'll let you leave out Santa if you want.

Ah, classic red herring! PP said I am interested in Jesus, not that he is the only historical religious figure worth studying.
Throwing in Gautama or Zoroaster doesn’t change what PP said.

DP. I'll ask the question a different way. Why only Jesus?

Whataboutism,
If you are interested in Jesus, you should also be interested in other religious figures.
Not logical rebuttal but rather an attempt to shift focus.

Why "should" pp be interested in other religious figures if they are interested in Jesus?

I see no "should". It was a very basic question. If you are afraid to actually answer, that speaks volumes about your ability to make a reasonable argument.

Don't make it more than it is. It is a simple compare and contrast type question that we all learned in 3rd grade English.

You will never get a direct answer. Any time a question is posed to the theists, they will deflect, attack the questioner, or debate the meaning of the question. It's worse than a politician on a Sunday political show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.

I’ve had enough of this kind of “unconditional” love to last a lifetime. It’s destroyed my family and poisoned relationships between all of us and it’s not unconditional in any way shape or form

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP I assume you are being intentionally provocative and trolling. I also assume you know that atheism is a position on religion and this is a religion forum, so it would be unusual to post an atheist position in any other type of forum.

If I did not assume those things, I would have to assume you are just really, really stupid. But I don’t think that is the case.

Very true.

OP just woke up on a slow Saturday and decided to attack some people, with the "I'm just asking!" spiel.

LOL you are right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are sad, searching for something in their lives. Deep down they know what they're missing. I pray they lose the blinders and turn to the one who loves them unconditionally before their hearts are forever hardened.

You can shove your pray up your rear end. The Christians who would vote for a cruel man like Trump are fake, they will burn in hell.