My son was enamored with Exeter’s campus after touring it. Nothing like the other four. He likes the Bristol program with their Innovation hub addition to the Business and Management program. He applied to Business programs everywhere but Edinburgh, where he applied to their MA Interdisciplinary Futures program after touring. |
My DD got unconditional offers at St. Andrews and Edinburgh in November, but has heard nothing from the LSE. Anyone hear anything from there? |
Is she really planning on attending one of the three? As of now, is she leaning STA or UofE? |
I'm hoping she'll choose a US option! I don't like the idea of her so far. But the choice is hers. I will discourage anything that isn't unconditional -- I don't want that hanging over her head in June and July. |
I hear you. Most offers to Americans from these schools are unconditional as they know what they are competing against. |
Actually this is not bad. Didn’t even know scholarships were available. |
Bristol’s new $100M Temple Quarter project will house their Innovation dept. It looks like a great opportunity. My husband used to teach at Bristol and he retired last year after 16 years. Bristol is moving up fast. They now officially have UK’s fastest supercomputer. |
This is great for Bristol. The previous top supercomputer in the UK (Archer 2) was at Edinburgh. And if they get their funding figured out they will get the next big Billion pound supercomputer. |
Thank you for the nice informative write up! |
Interesting Thread. We have a Junior that is adamant about going abroad.
Outside of Oxbridge/LSE or Imperial, how the next level of UK universities compare to US universities? I’m not asking about Job Prospects. Just a comparison of pedigrees in since this always the topic around DCUM. What are the US universities that would group well with each of these? UCL Kings Edinburgh St Andrews |
Based on QS rankings: UCL - in between Caltech and Penn/Berkeley Edinburgh - in between Yale and Columbia Kings - in between Columbia and UCLA/NYU/Michigan based on Times Higher Education: UCL - around Cornell/Michigan/Columbia/UCLA Edinburgh - around Duke/Nothwestern/NYU Kings - around UCSD and ahead of Brown/UT etc Based on US News: UCL right by Columbia and Yale Kinds and Edinburgh about tied and right by NYU Based on # of Nobel Prize Winners according to Aron Frishberg website: UCL - 24 (around Penn and Washington U) Edinburgh - 20 (around NYU, UCSD and ahead of UCLA and Michigan Kings - 11 (around Duke and USC) St Andrews - 3 (around Missouri/Pitt and FLorida) St Andrews doesnt do well in World Rankings as these are usually weighted towards research output and quality of research and not so much on undergraduate teaching. But you can clearly see based on a variety of sources, the equivalent universities…. |
St Andrews is more focused on undergraduate education, while the others are “research universities” where the graduate programs and research are viewed as more important by the faculty.
All in that set would be solid choices. Pick the one which is best fit for your student — and look into details of the students intended degree program at each university. Different unis will have stronger or weaker offerings in different academic areas. |
It’s OK takes up an offer from an American university and a conditional offer from a UK university. It’s sort of like staying on the waitlist of the school. |
I think this would be correct within the UK, as in how these universities are perceived in a relative sense. In other words, Oxford/Cambridge are sort of the HYP of the UK, and LSE is a Penn/Chicago, Imperial an MIT, and so on. But in terms of actual comparison with US universities, I’m not sure I would put UCL, Edinburgh, Kings, etc as high as the list above. UCL is maybe a T30, Edinburgh and Kings T50s. Or maybe you could make an argument of all as T30s, it isn’t exact. But aside from research output, I would put these schools a bit lower than their QS or THE rankings. |
I disagree as it relates to UCL, Edinburgh and Kings. There is a reason every major world ranking that takes into account research ranks them that highly (even the American biased USNWR rankings say so)…….You cant discount research and quality of research and just say “well…I think it is more like T50”. There is a reason research at these places are done at the top level…..Better universities bring better funding and more qualified professors, in turn they produce more research, which in turn brings in more funding, which in turn bring in better students, which in turn ……... It is a cycle that has been going on forever….you can discount an amazing research output of a school that has produced 20 Nobel Prize Winners and say “nah…I dont agree….it is all irrelevant…….they are at the same level of VT or FSU”. Cmon… |