As usual, most of you didn’t bother to read the article.
Nothing in it is crazy. It sounds like SAVE will not be defended (expected), borrowers will go back into older, less generous plans (expected), and this will all be a mess that will takes months to sort out (expected). No one is getting forgiveness revoked. And no discussion of destroying PSLF or the older repayment plans for existing borrowers. |
Loans have interest. Why is this advanced calculus for people? We already give tax breaks for student loan interest payments. There is zero incentive to provide loans unless a lender can obtain interest. Credit markets don't exist without interest. Welcome to adulthood teacups. I'd like a mortgage too with zero interest, lol. You don't borrow $40k and have the mindset that you paid back your fair share when you paid back $40k. In what realm of reality is anyone entitled to borrowing other peoples' money for free? So much delusional entitlement. You already get tax breaks for it anyway. |
Which statute relating to federal employees violates the constitution? |
Yep hence PSLF, a previously completely bipartisan program. |
If it was so bipartisan, why did the Trump administration refuse to carry it out as required by law? |
No. Ignore all the morons running around here, shouting about how things were hard for them, so things have to be hard for everyone, they paid for Harvard with their part-time burger skipping job etc etc. If you actually read the article/have stayed on top of this recently, there is no plan to claw back forgiveness. The closest is the suggestion to sunset PSLF for new borrowers (which is a definite possibility, but would need to be done by statute). |
Just one of the many ways Trump will destroy the economy. People don’t realize that student loan forgiveness is not charity or benevolence. It is to help pump more money into the economy. Too many people are so bogged down with student debt that they can’t spend any money. They can’t buy houses, cars, travel. My daughter is a second year teacher. No debt at all. She still doesn’t have much money to spend.
It is ridiculous that we convince 18 year olds to commit to this debt and then criticize them later on for not realizing the magnitude of what they took on. |
And that's what some of Biden's loan forgiveness plans addressed. I wish they had explained it better so people understood that many of these borrowers had paid off their principal years ago, or didn't have their loans forgiven even though they were in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/loans/student-loans/idr-waiver |
Note the word “previously.” |
The PP should have to pay it back with accrued interest for time it was forgiven. |
They did explain it. The GOP is simply better at developing simply slogans that idiots buy. |
good |
I don’t find it rational at all. Why should we forgive her interest and not that for someone’s mortgage or loan for healthcare expenses or a parent’s elder care? It’s all the responsibility of the person who signed the loan. It’s not the taxpayer’s. |
This! If you’re angry, you can’t process information. |
She says, from the perch of her overpriced urban farmhouse in N. Arlington that her formerly poor, nerdy grad student husband who she had the brilliant foresight to see potential in paid for with his seven-figure “sales” job. |