Pam Bondi - new nom for AG

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Y’all going to wish it was still Gaetz.

Nah. Florida politics don't work in DC.

Au contraire

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The other thing besides sexual misconduct allegations that’s bringing so many of Trump’s nominees together: bad stories about dogs.
https://www.businessinsider.com/rnc-speaker-pam-bondi-custody-battle-dog-with-katrina-victims-2020-8

To be fair at least she didn't kill the dog - that puts her miles above the others

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is making a mockery of this position. Two very unserious candidates whose main qualification is loyalty.

I’m not going to get anyone I actually like. But Bondi ran the Justice Department in a large state so she’s definitely qualified, and she hasn’t totally disrupted her workplace or been credibly accused of sexual misconduct with teenagers, so this is going to have to do.

She did a quid pro quo though. I’m not ready to settle.

So who would you like Trump to appoint?

Someone professional, ethical, and apolitical. Someone who isn’t interested in being on tv. Someone calm, thoughtful, and serious who takes public service and law and order seriously.

That's not possible with this guy as president

Four years. We have to make it through four years

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I realize I am begging for scraps here = but at least she registered with FARA. That already means she's 1000000x less corrupt and slimy than most of the guys Trump likes spending time with.

She's going to be terrible. It's one more instance of the worst people we know being rewarded handsomely while good people suffer. And yet it could be so much worse than her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the qualifications for DOJ nominee need to be:
NOT from Florida
NOT having ever representing Trump in a legal matter. Isn't that as blatant a conflict of interest as it could possibly be? Not only that, it was in one of his impeachment trials (although of course she didn't have to actually do anything.)
NOT have skeletons pertaining to dogs or sex.
NOT have a law degree from the school ranked 98th.

Stetson isn't a bad school.

Outside of the DMV, no one cares where you went to school once you have been in the workforce for many years.

[Anonymous]

I had no idea that there were legions of people who share Trump’s “values.”

They are, apparently, under every rock.

[Anonymous]

Good lord. Trump is setting such a low bar. Even the rationalizations of these last couple of posts, "well, yeah, she stole a dog, but at least she didn't shoot it" and "well yeah, she's in the pocket of foreign interests, but at least she didn't lie about it."

Please, Republicans, just stop this insanity already. I'm sure there are literally hundreds of excellent AG picks and Cabinet picks far better than this parade of misfits that Trump is waltzing out from behind the curtain.

[Anonymous]

It’s about time we had a hot AG

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s about time we had a hot AG

I'll just go for one that doesn't weaponize the DOJ.
Garland has been a joke. So glad he did not make it to SCOTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had no idea that there were legions of people who share Trump’s “values.”

They are, apparently, under every rock.

70+ million. They are out in the open.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the qualifications for DOJ nominee need to be:
NOT from Florida
NOT having ever representing Trump in a legal matter. Isn't that as blatant a conflict of interest as it could possibly be? Not only that, it was in one of his impeachment trials (although of course she didn't have to actually do anything.)
NOT have skeletons pertaining to dogs or sex.
NOT have a law degree from the school ranked 98th.

No, that’s just a list of cheap attacks at Pam Bondi. Can you give the name of one Republican you would support or at least tolerate for AG? If not, that puts your attacks on Bondi in context.

Crickets

I knew you couldn’t provide a name. You would lob silly attacks at whomever Trump appoints.

We know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that whomever trump nominates for any position in his cabinet that their loyalty is to trump not to the Constitution of the United States of America. We know that he is not using the FBI to vet his choices which screams there must be a lot to hide in his appointees this far.

"First rate people surround themselves with first rate people. Second rate people surround themselves with third rate people.". (Leo Rosen) Trump proves this by his choices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s about time we had a hot AG

I'll just go for one that doesn't weaponize the DOJ.
Garland has been a joke. So glad he did not make it to SCOTUS.

For as many things as I hate The Turdle about, him keeping Garland off the court goes a long ways in his favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s about time we had a hot AG

I'll just go for one that doesn't weaponize the DOJ.
Garland has been a joke. So glad he did not make it to SCOTUS.

For as many things as I hate The Turdle about, him keeping Garland off the court goes a long ways in his favor.

Yeah, because Gorsuch was such an outstanding choice! McConnell's Supreme Court will live in infamy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Y’all going to wish it was still Gaetz.

Uh, it was the GOP who leaked it. Clearly they didn't like him.

If they're too spineless to vote against a nomination, then this is better than nothing.

The next thing I want to see leaked is which congressman sexually harassed or assaulted MTG. The taxpayers have a right to this information, and frankly it's disgusting that MTG would protect this person (and Gaetz) but make a stink about one woman using the bathroom. Clearly it doesn't take a bathroom to get assaulted.

Finally, Bondi should have lost her license after that $25K payment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. Trump is setting such a low bar. Even the rationalizations of these last couple of posts, "well, yeah, she stole a dog, but at least she didn't shoot it" and "well yeah, she's in the pocket of foreign interests, but at least she didn't lie about it."

Please, Republicans, just stop this insanity already. I'm sure there are literally hundreds of excellent AG picks and Cabinet picks far better than this parade of misfits that Trump is waltzing out from behind the curtain.

Of course, but are those people willing to pledge allegiance to Trump and follow him opposed to the citizens of the US, something about the constitution. That's the rub. He can't get those people.